This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
With regard scammers and frauds , it's always asked " why didn't anyone warn anyone, how did this happen?"/ People do warn, it's just that no one listens . See Madoff and Harry Markopolos for example. It's possibly more profitable or net-positive to let frauds fun and accept some losses, than try to stop them and possibly cause less economic growth. For example, why does the Fed let bubbles expand instead of preemptively pop them? Because even after the bubble pops, the net gain is still higher than had they tried to stop it earlier. I have found most people do not care about frauds, only the victims care, but otherwise who cares. Let the good times roll and we will pay the tab later. I know that coinbase users are being scammed for millions due to a certain type of giveaway fraud and offered a solution to fix it but was rebuked. Society deserves the fraudsters its gets, I suppose, unless fraud prevention is valued more highly like it is in China, or fraud is tolerated less. America's approach is to administer sometimes very punitive punishments if fraud is found, but otherwise not be too vigorous in stopping it. I am not sure if this is the best approach as a deterrent.
Is there a story about this, sounds vaguely interesting. It certainly doesn't seem like China cares about companies or consumers in other countries being defrauded by Chinese companies (which is to be expected from a national interest perspective, but it still means my main experience with China is a certain level of casual fraud).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link