This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I think that a bisexual woman can presumably have a traditional exclusive relationship with a man, just like a man who has a thing for red-haired women can presumably have a traditional exclusive relationship with a brunette woman.
I would argue that the correct unit to measure student loan debt is "years till payoff". Presumably, in a well-earning profession, you can pay off your student loans in a decade?
Why? Most of the women who want to start a family will be closer to your threshold of 30 than 18. Why would you care how many guys she fucked when she was 3/5th of her current age? Why not also care how much Sailor Moon she watched when she was 12?
I mean, if during the last year, she has sucked off twenty random guys in some club bathrooms while drunk, then there is some argument to be made that she is likely not ready for the kind of relationship you have in mind. If the same thing was a decade ago and she had sex with two boyfriends since then, that paints a very different picture as far as her suitability is concerned.
Or is this more of an illegible aesthetic preference for sexual purity? Call me a horny guy, but I would rather settle down with someone after both of us had 20 partners than if we had zero partners.
As a guy, it took about zero willpower to stay under your limit, but I can tell you that if I had gotten the median number of sexual advances a woman will get before turning 30 things would look very differently.
Realistically, your limit of five will not select for women with few sexual partners, it will mostly select for women who are willing to lie about how many partners they had.
Realistically, this is a show-stopper. Perhaps it was different three decades ago, but today it is. I would happily stay single for the rest of my life before I would stick my dick into either MAGA or Hamas fans, for example.
This phrase covers a lot of spectrum. Probably 90% of the population are at least occasional drug users. Of course, there is a vast gulf between "not a teetotaler" and "addicted to crack".
If you are selecting for less than six lifetime sex partners, I do not think that you will have a lot of OF models left in your pool. While I am sure that there is the odd virgin on OF, it does not really strike me as a hobby for the purity-focused religious types.
(OT: If I start a line with 2., the preview will turn that into 1. Do we really need the editor to count for us? Relevant quote: He started to count to ten. He was desperately worried that one day sentient life forms would forget how to do this. Only by counting could humans demonstrate their independence of computers.)
Yeah 5 as a hard cutoff feels a bit crazy for a 30 year old. If they've been on the market from 15 onwards, which is broadly typical, that's achievable with 5 3-year long-term monogamous relationships.
More options
Context Copy link
Comments are parsed in Markdown, which is translated to HTML. By writing "2.", you are creating an ordered list, which is an HTML object that always starts counting from the beginning.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link