site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 28, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

16
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When people score men or women, they're usually going off looks alone.

Assuming a normal distribution, not inflated like the typical 1-10 scale is, I'd personally vary anywhere from a 4 to a 6, maybe a 7 if I get a nice haircut.

But I've consistently been able to date women significantly prettier than I am, because I have other characteristics that make me attractive in their eyes.

So he could very well state that he wants to date 8s as a 6, if he brings something else to the table.

Aren't you literally a doctor in a society that's a fair bit more traditional/marriage-orientated than the West? Especially since certain characteristics that play well in your home market likely aren't gonna play as well in the West.

You're correct that I'm a doctor in India (albeit I'm almost done with emigration) and that the place is more conservative when it comes to relationships and settling down.

That being said, it's not so conservative that casual relationships, flings and one night stands are unheard of. They're quite common as a matter of fact.

Like I said, I'm hardly the most handsome tool in the shed, but I am tall, broad shouldered, with a deep voice and a rather exotic accent. I also am, if I say so myself, quite funny and charming when I want to be.

These are universally attractive qualities, even if in some more conservative places, they're subsumed by more practical considerations like jobs, financial stability and family background.

I'm quite confident in saying that were I still on the dating scene, I could comfortably punch above my weight class when it came to looks, even if the latter aspects aren't as heavily weighted in Western society.

So OP is hardly hopeless, he's got a good job, and while he might need to work on his social skills, if he wants to date someone reasonably attractive he can do so even if his looks aren't the best. And it ultimately is a numbers game!