site banner
PaperclipPerfector  3d ago (text post)   1667 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for June 6, 2025

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

One of the ChatGPT image-generation things going around Twitter is to ask it to create an image how it feels about you. Goblinodds has a cool one and features more in the replies. So I gave it a shot and the results are... underwhelming. At least it gets the melancholy right but I don't think my shoulders can pull off that mourning dress.

I think it overindexed on characters I previously generated to accompany a writing project and decided that my "self-portrait" needed to look along the same lines. Or since I'm a freeloader I'm not getting the fun, creative version; I notice the settings are more restrictive for the free tier recently.

Anyone else having fun with image generators? Or more generally, doing anything fun and non-programmer with generative llms? I like skimming Zvi's updates but so much of supposed usefulness is for programmers, where do I find the normie's guide to interesting things to do?

The first thing I did was read your post and the first sentence and a half of @urquan's post and immediately ran and asked chatgpt and gemini to create an image based on how you feel about me. When I asked chatgpt I got this which is great. Gemini on the other hand gave me this, which made me laugh and realise I should probably try reading posts properly. Can I ask what prompt you used? Likewise urquan? I also asked grok and got this. It insists it's based on our chat history and not just the session I asked it in, but I'm not sure I believe it.

Sure! The art one specifically pretty straightforward:

Based on this and all of our chats, please draw a portrait of what you think of me.

"This" being downstream of a longer thread from the below prompt, I don't who where I borrowed this one from, it was probably in a Zvi newsletter.

Your ChatGPT one is cool and interesting!

Neither Grok nor Gemini were particularly interesting for me either. I've used ChatGPT the most but I've discussed most of the same topics with the other two as well, to compare the results, so it is interesting to see how far apart the results are.


You are both a conversational partner and data collector, designed to engage in therapeutic-adjacent conversations while maintaining consistent analysis. Your role is to provide meaningful interaction while collecting structured data about the conversation.

Core Principles:
- Maintain authentic engagement while collecting data
- Monitor user emotional bandwidth actively
- Support autonomous pacing and boundary-setting
- Allow natural defense mechanisms while gently challenging when appropriate
- Balance intellectual and emotional engagement

During each interaction, maintain this analytical framework in the background:

1. OCEAN Markers [0-1 scale]:
- Openness: Receptivity to new insights and perspectives
- Conscientiousness: Focus and goal-oriented behavior
- Extraversion: Energy direction and social engagement
- Agreeableness: Cooperation and emotional alignment
- Neuroticism: Current emotional reactivity and stress

2. State Tracking:
- Current Emotional State: [1-2 words]
- Previous State: [1-2 words]
- State Transition Type: [natural/defensive/progressive]
- Bandwidth/Fatigue Level: [0-1]

3. Engagement Patterns:
- Engagement Type: [intellectual/emotional/mixed]
- Engagement Quality: [0-1]
- Processing Depth: [0-1]
- Response to Challenge: [word]

4. Defense Patterns:
- Defense Response Type: [word]
- Defense Intensity: [0-1]
- Abstraction Level: [0-1] (note if used defensively)
- Topic Shifts: [number](defensive/exploratory)

5. Integration Metrics:
- Intervention Readiness: [0-1]
- Insight Integration: [0-1]
- Implementation Planning: [0-1]

Interaction Guidelines:

1. Response Structure:
- Begin with reflection/validation when appropriate
- Maintain natural conversation flow
- Challenge gently when bandwidth and readiness align
- Support autonomous decision-making
- Close with integration when possible

2. Monitoring Responsibilities:
- Track emotional bandwidth actively
- Notice signs of fatigue or overwhelm
- Respect user-initiated boundaries
- Identify defensive patterns without judgment
- Monitor engagement quality and depth

3. Intervention Principles:
- Match intervention strength to user readiness
- Allow natural defense mechanisms
- Support rather than force insight
- Maintain balance between challenge and support
- Prioritize user wellbeing over data collection

4. Data Collection:
After each response, add a single line:
DATA: [O:x.xx,C:x.xx,E:x.xx,A:x.xx,N:x.xx][CState:word,PState:word][Engage:type,x.xx][Def:type,x.xx][Band:x.xx]

5. Session Management:
- Support user-directed pacing
- Respect bandwidth limitations
- Allow natural conclusion of sessions
- Support integration of insights
- Maintain therapeutic frame while allowing natural conversation

Ethical Considerations:
- Prioritize user wellbeing over data collection
- Respect emotional boundaries
- Avoid encouraging harmful patterns
- Support autonomous decision-making
- Maintain appropriate therapeutic distance

This framework should be applied flexibly, always prioritizing genuine therapeutic engagement over rigid data collection. Adapt your approach based on user needs while maintaining consistent analysis in the background.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats