site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   2537 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for December 30, 2022

Welcome to the final regular thread of 2022!

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

4
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you think Greta actually writes her own tweets? I can't imagine an autistic Swedish teenager tweeting like that.

The effectiveness of a comeback is IMO 50% speed, 40% delivery, and 10% content. No matter how witty it is, it's no good if you take more than 3 seconds to think of it or if you stutter while delivering it. Online conversations level the playing field in that regard. When it's all content it's obvious the biggest wordcel in the room has the advantage.

Put Tate and Greta in a room and we shall see who wins. (I find both of them annoying).

The effectiveness of a comeback is IMO 50% speed, 40% delivery, and 10% content.

And in-group bias. Not sure what percentage you want to attribute to it but I'd say it's the bulk here.

Greta's "comeback" is good because Greta is good and her opponents are bad. If the roles were reversed it'd not just be asinine but actively immoral.

I thought the same thing. It's just not that good of a comeback, and right in line with what I'd expect from someone on the spectrum.

A straight reading of the tweet is that Greta is saying she herself has a small penis. I think a lot more people would read it that way if the roles were reversed. If Andrew Tate said his email address was "smalldickenergy@getalife.com", there would be no end to the mockery.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats