This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The Munich Agreement rested on the idea that the cessation of Sudetenland would be followed by no further German aggression against Czechoslovakia. It was then followed by further German aggression against Czechoslovakia.
Hacha voluntarily signed over independence. Hacha was the one who sought an audience with Hitler in Berlin, Hacha's concern was that the Benes faction were going to take over in Czechia, and they were going to start a war with Germany. It was not forced through German aggression. Nothing about the Munich Agreement stated that Hacha could not cede territory voluntarily to Hitler.
According to diplomatic memoirs and record, Hocha arrived to March 1939 negotiations because they were demanded by Germans. In the "negotiations", the Germans threatened Hocha with outright shooting war and bombing of Prague unless he surrendered without fight. that is called an "ultimatum", not negotiation.
Germans and Hungarians had the troops who proceeded with full occupation of the country within a day after the negotiations concluded, so the ultimatum was backed by force.
More damning, existing treaties had guaranteed independence of a Czhechoslovakia. Second round of negotiations on the topic of cessation of remaining independent Czechoslovakia and its annexation to Germany was a blatant aggression. The annexation was equally as voluntary as annexation of the Baltics to the U.S.S.R in 1940, which is, not at all.
Hacha voluntarily traveled to Germany and eagerly accepted Hitler's invitation. Most people do not even know what the Munich Agreement says, it's very short you can read it in two minutes. Hacha freely traveling to Berlin and making the agreement he did does not violate any part of Munich.
More options
Context Copy link
Additionally and even more to the point, when we are talking about Britain and France signing the Munich Agreement - the crucial party when analyzing their further actions regarding Poland - would one even remotely assume that the events coming after the signing of Munich Agreement vis-a-vis Czechoslovakia were what they expected and hoped for?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link