site banner

What would an updated Grand Tour look like?

This is an effortpost inspired by this subthread in Small Scale Questions Sunday. The question is what would a modern Grand Tour look like?

Basic assumptions:

  • The purpose of the Grand Tour is to experience the greatest achievements of European culture. A certain amount of hedonism is permitted (the brothels of Venice were a staple of the original Grand Tour) but the primary purpose is educational.

  • We take for granted that Western Civilisation is a distinct culture, that its roots are in Classical antiquity, that it is Christian, and (whether because it is superior or just because it is ours) it is the thing we are looking at.

  • We are looking at a living culture where possible, not just museums. This was an important point of the original Grand Tour - the tour ideally included fencing lessons in Paris, drawing lessons in Florence, and music lessons in Naples - in all cases these were the centres of living traditions at the time. Obviously, European culture is still very much alive and we will take this into account.

  • The modern tourists are a small mixed-sex group of early-20's Americans (or Canadians or Australians) from upper middle-class backgrounds whose parents are funding them to do the Grand Tour (the closest analogy to the original English aristocratic tourists).

  • Like the original Grand Tour, this is not an actual pilgrimage. Although a lot of religious sites make the itinerary for their historical or cultural importance or their architectural merit, we are not interested in spiritual importance as such.

  • We have 4-6 weeks (based on @grognard's comments). This is obviously a lot less than the original Grand Tour, but we can travel faster. I also assume we are doing this in during the summer, which affects what is open and such like.

From these we get the following conclusions:

  • We are not going to be wasting much time admiring the scenery. I am a proud European who has done a lot of travelling, but I don't think we have anything that stands up against the Grand Canyon or the Yosemite Valley.

  • We will do most of our travelling by train - both because it is the easiest way to get into European cities (traffic and parking are a nightmare) and because the European high-speed rail network is itself an outstanding achievement of modern European culture.

The original Grand Tour had a fairly standardised outbound route: London -> Paris -> Geneva -> through Switzerland and across the Alps to Northern Italy -> visits to various northern Italian cities including Venice and Florence -> Rome -> Naples. The return via German-speaking Europe was less standardised. @2rafa suggested a rough itinerary for the round trip on the other thread. I am going to disagree, and suggest a one-way Grand Tour: London (probably actually York) to Naples overland via Paris, Lausanne, Bologna, Florence and Rome. Why?

The core of the European culture that exists now is England and France. This historic core of European high culture (both in classical antiquity and the Renaissance) is Italy. London/Paris/Rome or London/Paris/Florence/Rome is the quintessential European itinerary for a reason. I think the return leg is relatively less valuable than it was in the eighteenth century. Vienna and Budapest are fascinating, but the culture that built them didn't survive World War I. A lot of the German sites that the original Grand Tour included was destroyed by allied bombing or Soviet criminality, or rendered culturally dead by de-Nazification. Berlin has a thriving modern culture, but I am inclined to exclude it from the Grand Tour on grounds of degeneracy. Also, changing religious norms mean that there is no longer the need to balance time spent in Catholic and Protestant countries. For example, the more intellectually inclined original tourists spent time in Heidelberg partly because the university in Catholic Bologna wasn't open to them.

The other controversial suggestion I am going to make is skipping Venice. It is a detour from the route I am proposing, and in my experience (I have visited twice) it is not worth it - it is now a culturally dead tourist trap (unless you are in town for the Biennale) and apart from the novelty of a city in a lagoon, it doesn't do anything that Rome and Florence don't.

What are the things we want to see:

  • Architecture and the visual arts. Obviously. A huge part of the point of the original Grand Tour, and easily accessible as a tourist.

  • Scientific achievement. Less accessible as a tourist, but I have tried to fit it in.

  • Engineering achievement. Apart from the trains and the various civil engineering marvels you see on the way, I have struggled here. The sine qua non of European engineering achievement is the British industrial revolution, but I don't know how to engage with that as a tourist. As an American, you can probably argue that this is less important because 21st century Europe is not noted for its engineering excellence. A lot of the most tourist-accessible engineering achievement is in military museums.

  • Performing arts, including classical music, including both traditional high culture, and excellent modern culture. The aim is as far as possible to experience arts in their spiritual home. Most of what we are looking for post-dates the original Grand Tour. I will assume that the modern tourists are able to get tickets to sold-out shows (most of the tickets I am going to list are easy to get hold of if you book well in advance).

  • Sport. This wasn't a thing at the time of the original Grand Tour, but is obviously a hugely important part of European culture, and can be experienced as a tourist if you can get tickets.

  • Food. Again, a hugely important part of European culture that is easy to experience as a tourist. French and Italian cuisines are globally recognised as excellent.

I have made a slightly arbitrary decision to exclude places which are associated with historically important events but where there is nothing spectacular there now - in particular I am not including any battlefields.

It is now after midnight in London - more route details to follow tomorrow.

Update

If anyone is still reading, I have finally got some time to write down the actual itinerary my brain was staggering towards.

1. London

I think we have 1 week in and around London. Within Central London, the key sites are:

  • Art galleries: National Gallery, Tate Britain and Tate Modern are obvious no-brainers. If you have the time and interest, several people in the thread have mentioned Sir John Soane's museum, which I have also heard good things about. When I am showing people round London, I go for the Cortauld Institute, partly because of the collection of Impressionists and partly because it is in Somerset House, which is a worth-the-visit building architecturally.

  • Unique and spectacular bulidings: Westminster Abbey, St Paul's Cathedral, the Tower of London (not only is this one of the best-preserved medieval fortified castles on the planet, it is also a Royal palace with the associated traditions and pagentry, and the hopefully-final location of the nearest thing this Earth has to a Silmaril - the Koh-i-Noor diamond), the Houses of Parliament (if you are visiting in summer, Parliament is in recess so the building is open to public tours). Tower Bridge - it is worth paying for the tour, which includes a visit to the machine rooms and the opportunity to cross on the top walkway. Spend some time wandering around the City (the one square mile historic core of London that is now the financial district - there is either a Wren church or a spectacular modern building round every corner.

  • Other museums: British museum (finest collection of looted antiquities in the world, and it isn't close), South Kensington museums - the Science Museum and the Natural History Museum are no-brainers, the Victoria & Albert would be as well except that it suffers from the all-to-common problem of modern museums that no curatorial effort goes into the permanent collection - the temporary exhibitions are spectacular, but touring the permanent collection feels like touring someone's attic. The Museum of London is

  • Museums relavant to special interests: The Bank of England Museum, the London Transport Museum, the Wellcome Collection (history of medicine), the British Library treasures collection (historically significant manuscripts, including one of the 4 surviving sealed originals of Magna Carta), the Imperial War Museum (which does exactly what it says on the tin), the Design Museum (likewise), the Handel/Hendrix museum (two composers in different eras lived in different flats in the same building - the whole building is now a museum).

  • Victorian interiors: This is not really Grand-Tour worthy, but my understanding of American anglophilia is that Victoriana is a big part of it. The Linley Sambourne house (Punch cartoonist) and the Leighton House (pre-Raphaelite artist and aristocrat) are spectacular preserved examples.

I am not including:

  • Madam Tussauds and the London Dungeon (tourist traps)

  • The Churchill Rooms (reluctantly, but it falls under the "battlefields are not achievements" criterion)

  • The London Eye or any viewing platforms (we already have views from Tower Bridge, the St Paul's galleries if you go up, and the chimney at Tate Modern)

  • The Zoo and Aquarium (great fun, but not quintessentially European or Western in any way)

  • Buckingham Palace (unspectacular architecturally)

  • Any Harry Potter attractions (ephemera, but I have no objection if you want to add them).

1a. London suburbs

There are two obvious suburban excursions in my view - both would be long half days.

Maritime Greenwich. The British seafaring tradition is one of Western Civilisation's crowning achievements - in fact I would be willing to defend the proposition that it was Western Civilisation's single greatest achievement until Neil Armstrong walked on the Moon. Greenwich is its spiritual home. Key attractions are the Cutty Sark, the National Maritime, the Royal Observatory, and the buildings of the Old Royal Naval College (Inigo Jones and Christopher Wren both did some of their best work there). It is traditional to travel one way by riverboat and the other by commuter rail.

Hampton Court Palace The Old Palace was built by Cardinal Wolsey in a deliberate and subversive attempt to compete in majesty with the King's palaces, and was confiscated by Henry VIII after Wolsey's fall. The Baroque palace added on by William III and Mary II after the 1689 Glorious Revolution was Cristopher Wren's answer to Versailles. The formal gardens (including the world's largest vine) and maze are also world-famous.

Other possible suburban excursions include Windsor (obviously), Kew Gardens (world's finest botanical garden, including the famous Victorian glasshouses and a gorgeously silly replica Japanese pagoda), and the Dulwich Picture Gallery (which stars a collection of Dutch Old Masters that had been bought to be the core of the Polish National Gallery collection, but the deal fell through when Poland was conquered in the 1790's - and it is a National Gallery worthy collection).

1b Day-trips from London

There are two obvious compulsory ones here:

Oxford or Cambridge (just under an hour by train). The University is the quintessential Western institution, and these are the second and third-oldest surviving universities, and are in the top 10 in contemporary rankings. Unfortunately it is hard to experience an ancient university as a university on a day-trip as a tourist, but the architecture of the Colleges and the various university museums make it worth the journey. The spirit of the original Grand Tour would include spending a couple of weeks participating in something like the Cambridge International Summer Programme (only weakly selective - you don't need to be an elite-university calibre student to participate), but we don't have time for that. You only need to do one of the two universities - Cambridge has the edge because of King's College Chapel, but Oxford has the advantage if you are doing Xtreme Tourism that it is on the same railway line as Stratford-upon-Avon, so you can spend most of the day in Oxford and get to Stratford in time for an evening Shakespeare performance.

Bath (1hr 20 by train). As one of the Great Spas of Europe and home of the Roman Baths, this is the sort of place that would have been on the original Grand Tour if it included England. Apart from the Roman Baths, none of the individual sites are quite Grand Tour worthy, but the cathedral, fashion museum, Jane Austen museum, and fine Palladian architecture collectively make the bar.

Other candidates include:

Stonehenge. This is an odd duck. It is utterly underwhelming as a visitor (you can no longer get within touching distance of the stones unless you manage to wrangle a pre-arranged sunrise visit, and it is literally just a circle of large stones), but it is one of the outstanding achievements of Stone Age architecture anywhere in the world, is several hundred years older than the pyramids, and technically qualifies under the "scientific achievement" heading given that the alignment of the site is evidence of systematic astronomy. I struggle to imagine doing a serious Grand Tour without including it. Unfortunately the site is not easily accessible by public transport (if you try, it ends up being a full day with Salisbury Cathedral and Old Sarum thrown in as filler attractions) - there are various coach tour options including stopping off at Stonehenge on the way to or from Bath.

Canterbury (1 hour by high-speed train). As the mother church of the Anglican Communion and the place where St Thomas a Becket met his martyrdom, Canterbury Cathedral is a legitimate pilgrimage destination for Episcopalians or other Anglosphere Protestants who see the English Reformation as part of their religious tradition. Otherwise it doesn't make the cut - you are going to be seeing a lot of cathedrals on the Grand Tour and unfortunately (unlike Bath) the other attractions in Canterbury are a bit crap.

York (Just under 2 hours by train) In my view, too far for a day trip. There is a version of the Grand Tour that begins in Edinburgh and stops off in York en route to London, but I don't think we have time for it if we are going to get to Naples in 4 weeks.

1c Cultural experiences to enjoy in London

Theatre - obviously Shakespeare is on the menu. If you have enough evenings, it is probably worth seeing Shakespeare at the Globe (where they do it the way Shakespeare would have done it, which was not highbrow at the time - the main competition for the original Globe was the bear-baiting next door) and Shakespeare done highbrow (possibly in Stratford). I also think a West End show is worth it. Modern commercial theatre is clearly an achievement of Western civilisation, some of it is very good indeed, and the West End is a major centre with its own unique version of the tradition. The high-end product is large-scale music theatre - frankly, the Grand Opera of our time - and the best composer in that style is Andrew Lloyd Webber. So I would pre-book tickets to an Andrew Lloyd Webber musical. (Phantom of the Opera is generally considered the best musically).

Music - if we are doing the London-Naples route, then London is probably the best place to take in a classical concert. (For other routes, the standard of classical music is generally higher in the German-speaking bit of Europe). I would leave the opera to Paris or Milan - it is normally sung in the original language anyway. I don't spend enough time in the contemporary music scene to know if it is worth going to gigs in London or not.

Football - this is a huge part of European culture, and the Grand Tour should include a match. If you want to play the sophisticated soccer fan back in the US, you need to go to an EPL game. Brentford/Crystal Palace/Fulham/West Ham have more easily available tickets than Aresnal/Chelsea/Tottenham Hotspur. But if you are only going to one football match, I would skip London and go to a Serie A match somewhere in Italy - the fan culture is much healthier, the tickets are cheaper, and the sporting standard is similar.

Other sport - given the nature of the Grand Tour, it might make sense (depending on dates) to attend one of the socially prestigious sporting events which form part of the London Season. Royal Ascot probably offers the best compromise between a high production values sporting and social occasion and tickets actually being available to the masses.

Clubbing - the European nightclub culture based around electronic dance music is distinct from American nightclub culture based around overpriced bottle service and therefore qualifies as permissible hedonism for Grand Tourers. The spiritual home of this culture is Ibiza, but London is the best clubbing city on the London-Naples route. I am too old to offer further advice, but @5434a recommends Fabric and Printworks. The Ministry of Sound is canonical, but probably qualifies as a tourist trap by now.

Food - we can obviously skip French and Italian (both are good in London, but not as good as in their home countries). For splurge meals, I would be looking at three choices:

  • Traditional British luxury. The Savoy Grill is the obvious choice, but the restaurants at any of the grand London hotels qualify.

  • Updated takes on traditional British cuisine (which doesn't suck if done right) - St John is canonical for this sort of thing. The Hawksmoor chain of steakhouses would also qualify - although the menu is a bit too similar to a smart American steakhouse to be distinctively British.

  • Some kind of weird modern fusion cuisine that could only exist in a city as diverse as London. Use Michelin or Zagat's to find candidates.

For more ordinary meals, some obvious pointers are:

  • Traditional fish and chips

  • Modern street food at Borough Market or Greenwich Market

  • Sandwiches at Pret a Manger (a ubiquitous chain that is actually good and mostly serves office workers)

  • Curry. The Brick Lane curry houses are tourist traps. Tayyabs in Whitechapel is canonical for City workers going for a curry after work, but there are hundreds of good curry houses in London. Chicken Tikka Massala is the canonical London curry - it is a British take on Butter Chicken. Balti is also thoroughly British - it comes from Birmingham.

Update - there appears to be a small amount if interest in going on, but I am close to the 20k character limit and still struggling with a crunch at work, so I am going to put some quick notes in the comments.

7
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I did this ten years ago in college, twice, once as a student and once as a TA. Twelve kids (six boys and six girls), two professors, two vans; 35 cities, 15 countries, 12 weeks. Route started in Paris, around Northern France then South to Spain, across Southern France to Italy, ferry to Greece, Constantinople, up through some Slavic countries to Hungary, then through some Germanic countries back to Paris. So I have a ton of thoughts, some probably slightly out of date, but practical given that I have two tours of experiences and have pretty extensive knowledge of how the trips before and after mine went as well. Semi-Organized thoughts follow, I may add more later as this thread grows or I have time to think:

GOALS/PURPOSE

OP states that the goal is to experience European Culture. I agree with that, with the cynical addendum that the benefit of the Tour is to have enough experiences that one can competently speak on European Culture in social situations. Foreign travel has long been the ultimate upper-class status symbol, the Grand Tour gave you a set of cultural touchstones that would allow you to talk to others of your class, the modernized one still does. The kind of upper middle class kids we’re talking about will one day be at cocktail parties where Law Firm Partners/C Suiters/Managing Directors etc will say they’re going/they just went on a two month trip to Greece on vacation. Having done the Tour, you will be able to say “Oh, what did you think of Elefsina?” Or “Make sure you don’t miss Meteora!” as appropriate. In 3 months you can squeeze in enough to have a wide range of experiences to talk about at cocktail parties for the rest of your life; the goal is to pack enough into two weeks in Italy to hold up your end of the conversation with someone who traveled there for months.

So, because I prefer cynical goals for structure to wishy-washy profound ones, I’ll say the sub-goal is to be exposed to elements of European culture that will act as high-class status markers for the Tourers on their future endeavors. With that out of the way...

PLACES/EVENTS

— Normandy. A beach and a graveyard. I know you said no battlefields, but if you’re an American this is critical. It’s an important part of history, it is fascinating and profound to see, and you’ll bring it up in a speech at the VFW when you run for office twenty years from now. While here, drink cider and calvados, and maybe visit Mt. St. Michel if you can.

— Greece. I loved Greece the most out of every country we visited. The history is vital to Classical European Civilization as a concept, being there also helps you understand the Byzantine and Orthodox strands of European civilization that Anglo Hegelian history can miss. Food is great, and great in a way where you can get great Greek food everywhere you go where haute French cuisine is an occasional treat. Athens, Meteora, Lepanto were my highlights; also visited some other locations on the mainland and Crete.

— Budapest. Call it ethnic pride, but the most beautiful women on the trip were in Budapest, as were the best bars. One of the boys on our trip with an LDR back in the states refused to go to the bars with us because he thought he couldn’t trust himself around them. Cheap, beautiful, historic.

-- You MUST drive on the Autobahn. Absolute necessity. Not hard to rent a car with an international driver's license, everyone will ask about it later.

— In one of England/France/Germany/Italy/Spain you should see a football match. Ideally a mid-range side, somewhere between a mid-table top flight and a top-table second flight team. It’ll be cheap, you’ll have fun. Buy a scarf. Then for the rest of your life if someone asks you if you like soccer, you can say “Oh, I support Girona/Torino/Nice, I saw them live and just fell in love! I know they never win it all, but going to game was so amazing that I can’t support any other team.” This gets you soccer street-cred among PMC europhiles where you’d get called a frontrunner for supporting Real/Barca/Bayern/Juventus, while also getting you out of the conversation because nobody actually cares about Girona.

— A shocking number of European colleges teach some courses in English. Try to get the chance to sit in on a class at an elite school, it’ll make a fun experience and get you some local color.

— I agree with @orthoxerox that you should mix “chill” cities into the “Pack in cultural stuff” cities. In particular, assuming Americans, I’ll note that you should map out which cities are good for which things. In Italy and Greece and Turkey I stand out like a sore thumb, I can’t blend in if I want to. From Hungary through Vienna to Dresden, people kept walking up to me and asking me questions in German, then getting pissed when I’d say I didn’t speak German thinking I was just being a penis and didn’t want to talk to them. Pick chill places your mix of looks/language skills will match. I will say, for chill I hated France and Spain, loved Rome and Athens and Berlin.

ROMANCE, GENDERED DIFFERENCES

No one is going to consider their European Tour complete without a European Romance to talk about later. (I’m going to assume they’re all sluts, good Christian boys and girls wouldn’t travel without already having a spouse unless it was a mission trip.) Unfortunately, I had and you specified a mixed-gender group, and women and men will have vastly different results. A lack of facility with the local language, local knowledge, and a private home to return to are huge disadvantages to men, minor inconveniences for women. There is no town in France so small that a horny 21 year old American girl can’t find a gallant Gaul to keep her warm; and there is no rave in Berlin big enough that a nebbish New England boy can’t strike out with every girl there. [I lack personal experience here, when I traveled I was monogamous with the-now-Mrs. FiveHour]

For the boys, this means that you need to protect them from getting robbed or scammed by clever prostitution rings. You don’t want anybody to end up like Albert in the Count of Monte Cristo I’ve never actually seen it happen, but I’ve seen things that felt shady happen to friends. The set-up is something like, a girl who barely speaks English seduces a tourist who has cash at a bar, takes him to a second location, fucks him, her pimp shows up and demands an absurdly large sum of money as payment. The tourist is scared, doesn’t know if he can call the cops, hands over the money. The best way to avoid this is to get your boys some action, but I have no idea how you do this, so anyone who has more experience in being single/romantic tourism can chime in.

For the girls, this means you need to protect them from predators and green-card grifters. I’ve literally known a half dozen cases in my life of mid white girls marrying Arab or Eastern European dudes who were just trying to get citizenship and end up ruining the girl’s life. The important thing is making sure everyone understands you’re in Europe for a good time, not a long time, and talk some sense into anyone getting starry eyed.

For both groups, try to get everyone to be accommodating of bringing people back to your rooms, its safer than people getting dragged to a third location.

With the mixed group, out of 6 and 6 inevitably, like clockwork, every year, two boys who kept striking out with local girls would fall for two girls on the trip, who would normally rebuff the boys because their egos were in overdrive from being a female tourist in Italy. Alas, the heartbreak inevitably played out by some bridge in some historic town. Try to keep it from dragging the group down.

GEAR

— Everyone in the group should get a watch. Just one that tells time, I’m not trying to rehash the watch thread from earlier. A watch is the most basic communication device if not everyone has a functioning cell-phone or can ask the locals reliably; “Meet up at 4:00 at the hotel” is much easier to execute if you know when 4:00 is.

— Men, buy a good comfortable unstructured blazer, you can pull it on over anything and look more put together. Everyone from Lululemon to Hugo Boss makes something called a travel blazer, but I just wore a regular navy cotton unstructured blazer from LL Bean. I’m a big believer that you should never travel without clothing appropriate for church or a nice dinner, I find dressing poorly when visiting a cathedral disrespectful, and dressing up will get you better treatment than you’ll get in cargo shorts a lot of places. In addition, a good blazer has a ton of pockets you can keep stuff in to stay organized, and the inside pockets (or zippered pockets ideally) will keep valuables secured. I’m a big fan of dressing well when you travel in general, it’s a great opportunity to put together a capsule wardrobe and have no choice but to look great, but the blazer is the core element of looking good as a white-ish man.

— Speaking of valuables, don’t take anything you care about on this trip. Your grandmothers ring, your lucky necklace, your favorite earrings, your top-of-the-line phone, your expensive winter down jacket, your favorite shoes, your dog eared and annotated Walden you take everywhere. Leave them behind, your odds of losing them on this trip are IMMENSE with the constant travel. Not even talking theft, just leaving them behind and not realizing it until you are two countries away. Buy a cheap phone, clothes you don’t care about, leave the sentimental stuff

Hugo Boss makes something called a travel blazer

General advice: Hugh Boss suits are very poorly regarded in the male fashion world, they're fused and low quality even for modern fused suits. Also the link is to a Hugo by Hugo Boss suit which is a diffusion line so one step below even regular Hugo Boss stuff. Get yourself a decent Canali if you want a good fitting suit that will last years to come.

I agree with @orthoxerox that you should mix “chill” cities into the “Pack in cultural stuff” cities.

To expand on my idea, it's still about the "cultural stuff", but of a more mundane type. The burbs have been present in so many American media as the default environment that even most Europeans don't notice anything wrong until they find themselves watching Hey Arnold! or some other media about urban Americans that is not a crime drama and realize there's a more immediate connection. But American burbs are very much American.

So if the tourers are not from a NYC borough or SF I would suggest spending a week in an AirBnB with a pretty relaxed schedule: let them go shopping and cook their own meals, take a day trip by train or by bus, visit the local university and appreciate the differences from their alma mater, go clubbing with the locals (get drunk because it's Europe and you are allowed to, get into a fight because no one's packing heat), install WhatsApp on their phone to stay in touch with the new best friends (formerly sparring partners), buy something in Zara or H&M that "looks either gay or European", get spooked in a Muslim or African ghetto, etc.