This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The Dread Jim weighs in on the "moderate right".
Basically, to him the right isn't progressing at anywhere near the rate it needs to in order to enact radical change. He uses Asmongold, the popular live streamer, as an example. Asmongold is perceived to be anti-woke, but in reality all of his positions (in Dread Jim's opinion) are moderate/centrist.
For Dread Jim, the only way to save civilization is through the following:
He seems to view this last solution as the most important. Fathers should once again be responsible for marrying off their daughters, and if that's not possible, the state should step in. Similarly, adultery should be punishable by death.
Barring these radical changes "failure to murder everyone who is insufficiently left is likely to also be 'extreme far radical right'".
Luckily for him, he does not even have to fight the federal government for that, because his dream country already exists. It is called Afghanistan.
Sure, he will have to make some compromises as there are no buildings high enough in rural Afghanistan to throw the gays to their death, but I wholeheartedly recommend he goes there and waits for the decadent Western civilization to collapse and being replaced by the Taliban regime.
This sentence has too many negations in it for my taste.
Let me try to dig out the core:
Virtually nobody is advocating for the cleansing of all the people who are not left. Not the GOP, not the Dems, not the woke mob. Even if you say that everyone except literal Nazis is sufficiently left, the position "let us just kill all the Nazis outright" is very fringe. Getting Nazis fired, cast out from society, forcibly re-educated, perhaps put into labor camps for life might all be popular fantasies on the fringe left, but simply gassing them and be done with it is unlikely to be the consensus even in Antifa.
His claim is that this would make Antifa 'extreme far radical right'.
--
More broadly, I think that fringe opinions should not influence our broad categorization of the political spectrum. I can probably find a crazy person who is arguing that we should take "eat the rich" literally and slaughter and barbecue the top 10% income bracket. I could then claim that simply taxing rich people out of their wealth but not eating them is a "moderate left" position, actually.
Afghanistan has many mountains, so there are surely places with long enough drops.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link