site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 16, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

13
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I first encountered induction stoves maybe in the... 1990s? I thought it was a fantastic idea (and kind of a bit sci-fi) so I was stunned to learn that they were first introduced in the 1930s--but have simply been too expensive to really take off. In the 1990s, maybe early 2000s they were reasonably affordable (I no longer recall precisely, but I think they were not even twice as expensive as a similar electric range) but around that same time, "cooking with gas" became quite a meme. I think it was perhaps 2000 or 2001 when I first noticed young people bragging that "real chefs cook on high" or somesuch, and being snobby about cooking over gas flame. Wikipedia tells me the "Food Network" launched in the early 1990s, so I have my guesses about how that particular meme wormed its way into people's minds.

However in trying to source some of my own memories on appliance trends, I was intrigued to find this year-old article about the "bitter breakup with gas stoves" on our collective horizon. So I'm not really sure this particular culture war issue has been any more bizarre (or out-of-nowhere) than any other--a Biden appointee really did suggest a gas stove ban, and legacy news media did more or less immediately castigate Republicans for pouncing on that.

I do not presently have an induction stove. But I would like one. Maybe someday!

First time I'm hearing that induction stoves are expensive!

I had one in India during my student days, I believe it cost about $200, and it did all I could ask of it. I don't think I even used it above the 1000 watt setting, though I believe it went up to 2000.

First time I'm hearing that induction stoves are expensive!

Well, they used to be a lot more expensive. However--

I had one in India during my student days, I believe it cost about $200, and it did all I could ask of it.

Are you referring to a simple hot plate style burner? Because you can get those in the United States today for under $50. I don't know how long ago you were a student, but even today in the United States, $200 would be a lot for a student to pay for such an appliance (Amazon has single-burner hot plates for under $20). But if you're talking about a drop-in countertop range with multiple burners, or even a complete range/oven combo, then yeah, $200 was probably "not expensive."

I love my induction range/top and am eternally regretfull that I didn't buy a double over the single one I have. The only downside as the OP mentioned is the need for specific cooking ware (having to carry a magnet when shopping is a little onerous) but the advantages clearly outpace that little downside.