This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
John Bull was not a real person but the qualities he represented were real. He represented Britain.
Davos Man is not a real person, yet the qualities he represents are real. These are the people who decide where the world is headed. It's the heartland of the liberal economic consensus, of the stupid buzzwords like 'resilient dynamism' and 'Creating a shared future in a fractured world'. Xi Xinping gave the 2017 address, defending free trade. Nahrendra Modi gave the 2018 address. It's a high profile event, even if it's purely symbolic.
Schwab is Davos Man incarnate. He founded the WEF and is seen to be responsible for Davos. If you're against the liberal internationalist consensus, you're against Davos and Schwab. We like to personify things. See US caricatures of the Jap in WW2. It's a natural propagandistic tactic.
Thus we get artfully done videos like: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UrEUzKTt7j0
Leonardo attacks a lot of things - big tech, Snopes fact-checking, mask/muzzle-wearing, modern 'art', Chainlink smart contracts (which is a somewhat esoteric /biz/ meme), public transport, eating the bugs... But all of them are seen to come under the aegis of Davos Man, they are the policies of the elite. Or they will soon be policies of the elite. You're not supposed to interpret the idea literally - nobody genuinely thinks that you just need to perforate Schwab's head and decisively change the world. He's representative.
What? Since when was Chainlink globohomo? I only really check /biz/ when crypto goes up or down for the fun doomer or smug posting so maybe there has been a change but link just seemed like a super meme.
Well the idea is that Chainlink oracles will allow automatic control mechanisms. The use-case is that it's supposed to convey information from off-chain securely to on-chain. If Alice bets 20 Eth that Biden wins the election, an oracle is needed to determine if he wins or not, so the Eth goes to the right person. The fear is that Chainlink will be used to take away the banking of wrongthinkers as in the video. It's firmly enmeshed into the crypto ecosystem at this point and all but dominates its niche.
Plus the price action has been very bad and people are very dissatisfied with it, often blaming Sergey for selling too much. Chainlink's strongest defenders have been effectively silenced. To be fair, supply has increased at a fairly moderate rate, FTM or MATIC have seen much more supply increase and much greater appreciation per token. There's also disquiet at how many women are in Chainlink's management and HR branch.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link