site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 16, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

13
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't believe it's true

How would you go about resolving this disagreement? I've seen BLM / trans-women-are-women / etc talk in "backwards" European countries. Is it the "rural" part you're disagreeing with?

How would you go about resolving this disagreement?

A large number of gender reassignment surgeries, for example.

1/ Such surgeries are rare everywhere, even in the most woke areas. Dressing up and injecting yourself with various substances is one thing, but few people have what it takes to go all the way.

2/ It is gender affirming surgery, meaning the intended gender was always there deep inside (like statue was always inside the boulder) and just needs some cutting and chopping to come out.

Words like "gender reassignment" or "gender change" are big no no, saying something like this is good way to be cancelled.

You need to keep track, you need to know the latest woke terminology, in your situation you cannot afford such tongue slips ;-)

gender affirming surgery

For some reason, this is one line I feel I cannot cross. I will never ever ever call it this. I currently self-censor with "gender surgery", which fortunately I have yet to get in hay for. And I will willingly adopt a term like "secondary sex characteristic remodeling" or whatever anodyne euphemism progressives want come up with. But if it comes down to saying "gender affirming surgery" I'll just go on unemployment and become a trucker or something.

I don't really know why this is the hill I'm willing to die on, but there it is.

It's like Neocons, rather than calling it "enhanced interrogation techniques", insisted everyone must call torture "patriotic heroism techniques".

In eastern Europe these happen mostly through private clinics, which have no obligation to share the data with the public. Best I can give you is mommy Facebook groups showing off their kids' mastectomies, but no indication of numbers of affected people.