This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The eternal question: Are Traps Gay?
I don't know, but Brigitte Lin was amazing in Swordsman II and The East is Red (which I have only seen in terribly subtitled and even more terribly edited versions ages ago). She's playing a man who was turned into a woman via magical martial arts techniques, so she's attracting both male and female lovers.
It's situational. Apologies for the Reddit link; pointing at the image directly ends up breaking the link.
Note that, assuming the reactor is a man, there are 2 different "orientations" hidden in here. They're not the ones you'd expect.
First is the
straightobligate woman-fucker one, where the fact it's a man doesn't really come up or have much relevance. See girl physical features, fuck those features, the fact he's not a girl is secondary to the experience.Last is the
gayobligate man-fucker one, where the fact it's a man is both not only central to the experience but focuses just as hard on the physical features of the participant(s). It's just that it's focused on the physical features of him being a man. The fact he's not a girl is also secondary to the experience.The space in between them is the weird one, where the fact he's not a girl is primary to the experience. These works tend to be focused far more on the emotional aspects of the difference (and, like, not actually being a girl) rather than merely the physical ones.
These traps also tend to intentionally de-emphasize primary and secondary sexual characteristics, so you could probably rather accurately term it asexuality (as in, how I'd expect people who don't have the biological 'reproduce now' imperatives running at the forefront of their minds). Sure, it's still sexual in fact, but it's a bit different than that in intent. [More cynically, it's the two-player version of sex where the others are single-player.]
People whose model of sexuality is limited to the first block cannot draw a distinction between it and the second block, and our language of orientation restricts us to talking about the first block. That's why traps can be in superposition between gay and not gay; the term can't answer the question.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link