site banner
PaperclipPerfector  1mo ago (text post)   2642 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for October 26, 2025

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ThomasdelVasto asked the question yesterday, and I had been wondering it myself, so I'll ask it here: how many lawyers are on this site?

Faceh, anti_dan, RovScam, and myself are the ones I can think of right away. I believe naraburns has a JD but isn't practicing law. Any others?

The more important question is: Which ones are cooler—lawyers, doctors, programmers, or engineers?

I'm an engineer (civil), but I vote for lawyers. Engineers merely apply the simple guidelines that have been laid out for them by the researchers of AASHTO, ASCE, et cetera. But the guidelines laid out for lawyers in documents like the Restatements (to say nothing of the tens of thousands of judicial opinions) need real brainpower to understand and apply.

Neither. The majority of those professions are trapped in somewhat soulcrushing positions where they are not allowed to show the spark of genius that gives the high of being engineer/doctor etc.

I don't know, absolutely killing a trial or oral argument certainly provides an opportunity for "the spark of genius that gives the high," especially since it is public and social and surrounded by the prestigious trappings of power in a way being a doctor or engineer isn't. And the doctors and engineers I know seem to be stuck in soulcrushing, cog-turning positions at roughly the same rate as the lawyers.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats