This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I’m putting the descriptions in quotation marks because I’m taking them as-is from the website, sometimes the people involved used different names or gender identities.
There we are: 36 deaths, but how many of them would you count as genuine anti-trans hate crime violence epidemic? I'm not trying to deny transphobia and hate crimes exist, just point out that the next time you see "X trans deaths! our society is homophobic and transphobic, this proves it!", that may not be the exact motive for murder instead of the traditional ones of greed, lust, revenge, etc. that happen to straight white cis people too.
Age verification on sex/porn sites doesn't do anything, that stuff is hilariously trivial to circumvent. Like you might as well try to ban drug by requiring people to say "I promise not to do drugs in here" every time they enter any building.
More options
Context Copy link
In my experience, trans people tend to lead rather unusual lives, in many ways. That makes it hard to draw any clear chain of causality.
In particular, there's a type of "theater kid trans," who has an extremely extroverted personality and is constantly going out of their way to seek attention They can make a lot of friends that way, but also annoy people. I can see how that sort of person could end up getting murdered by someone they annoyed, and it's not directlly because they're trans, but it's not totally unrelated either. The fact that so many of your examples are black adds a whole other element to this of course.
More options
Context Copy link
In at least this case (and probably several others), the perpetrator was also trans, which in a sane world would rule out "anti-trans animus" as a motive:
Ah, that's the update I didn't get. Yeah, a lot of these cases can't be "the victim was killed for being trans" because one, at least, the aggressor was upset because he didn't want the relationship to end and already knew the person was trans. Several of them are former partner, so again it's "knew the person was trans".
What boggles my mind is the hit-and-runs. Someone gets knocked down in a routine kind of traffic accident such as happens hundreds of times, but this is judged societal forces of violence that disproportionately affect minorities or something? I do not get any rationale behind including these, apart from "the demand for hate crimes outstrips supply" so they need to pump up the numbers.
"Two people murdered for no reason but being trans" over two years is a lot less impressive than "thirty-six people killed!"
Crime does disproportionately impact minorities, though, including trans people. If you're poor or mentally ill, you're far more likely to be a victim of a crime than if you're not.
The issue is that the HRC apparently thinks press releases about how bad abstract "systemic" transphobia is is a more effective way to address the disparate impact of crime than increase policing and enforcement policies in the most victimized communities.
As @sarker points out above it appears that crime does not, in fact, disproportionately impact trans people.
More options
Context Copy link
I honestly don't see how "trans woman killed by her boyfriend" included in stats about anti-trans/hate crime are going to do anything. Same for the traffic accidents: will we get lessons on how not to drive like a transphobe? The only reason there is to inflate numbers.
Indeed, and that's the issue. Moreover, as much as you're not going to learn how to drive from a vacuous press release, the people actually responsible for the crimes are even less likely to. These types of studies serve essentially no purpose but to distract from the real causes, and they only get any credence because people are too afraid to call them out or think about calling them out.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
The HRC Foundation is an explicit advocacy group for LGBTQ+ people. Of course one would expect them to take the broadest definition possible when tabulating hate crimes against their advocacy group. The SPLC routinely does this manner of thing as well, to the point where even the ADL thinks there's half as many Klansmen in the US than the SPLC seems to think. If the ADL thinks you've lost the plot that's really saying something. And does anybody really think a prisoner getting stabbed over drugs is "right-wing violence" just because the perpetrator has Nazi tattoos?
I don't think people who parrot these types of statistics are truth-seekers. They're 'arguments as soldiers' types. The point is to win and to use those wins as political leverage to get extra protections for their group. Confront them with the more salient facts and what would you expect to get as a response? "Gee I guess hate crimes against trans folks isn't as big of a problem as I previously thought" or "The only reason someone like you would even question these statistics in the first place is because you're transphobic, and I'm not having a conversation with a bigot"? The percentage of people who might be moved one way or another by this kind of digging into the data is small, perhaps very small.
I don't expect to convince anyone, just blow some of the smoke away so we can see how big the fire is. The ones where it's (for instance) the 14 year old are very sad and again GODDAMN IT GRINDR HAVE SOME STANDARDS EVEN IF YOU ARE A DEPRAVED HOOKUP SITE FOR PERVERTS but there's always going to be the problem of kids pretending to be older than they really are in order to get around restrictions.
Really, it's just "no, there is not in fact an epidemic of violence out there". 'Former partners kill their female partners' has been going on forever and a day, this time it's just 'even if it's trans female' nowadays.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I thought it was fairly accepted amongst those who look semi-critically that the majority of anti-Trans violence was brought on by some mix of streetwalking, gay panic and the like. Which these seem to just about align to for the most part. It is pretty striking how high a proportion of the victims are Black.
I hate wokists and people who lie with statistics (but I repeat myself rimshot) as much as the next mottizen, but "trans-identity is associated with major risk factors" doesn't really undermine claims it's a vulnerable population, just the simplified rhetoric.
More options
Context Copy link
We're not supposed to notice that, and if we do, it's the fault of Society:
But indeed, a lot of the "and the victim was standing on a street at one o'clock in the morning" or "found dead in alleyway/parking lot" do sound like sex work, which is and has always been dangerous, whether you're gay, straight, cis or trans.
More options
Context Copy link
I presume it tracks the murder rate by ethnicity among US population as a whole.
The interesting thing seems to be that for the trans population as a whole, while it's the white people who make the most noise about it, the majority are going to be BIPOC and poor(er) and hence the sex work. Rather the same dispute as about gayness (wealthy white men are presumed to be the majority, this is not so) or feminism (the whole breaking away of mujerismo, womanism and black feminism in response to the same complaints about 'middle-class white women are not representation').
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link