Transnational Thursday is a thread for people to discuss international news, foreign policy or international relations history. Feel free as well to drop in with coverage of countries you’re interested in, talk about ongoing dynamics like the wars in Israel or Ukraine, or even just whatever you’re reading.
- 9
- 1
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
What kind of intervention would work? Like, if US strikes major IRGC headquarters would it be enough? Government buildings? Something else?
I am kind of ignorant on the relative forces alignment there - like, is there some organized movement that can take over? Do they have some Schelling points to gather around? I mean, coming out to the streets is nice but that alone does not lead to the change of government - there should be some kind of competing structure to displace the existing one? I mean there's the previous Shah's dynasty, but how popular they are? How much resources would they be able to control if they decided to take over? Who will be fighting in the streets and who will be commanding them on the ground?
At first, bombing facilities and leadership is a good start. So is denying air power to the regime.
Later, as the protestors gain control of areas, they can be protected from the air.
The immediate Schelling point is removing the regime from power. Any domestic opposition could only be very loosely organized in advance because Iran runs a highly effective police state. The exceptions are some separatist movements like they have in Kurdistan and Baluchistan.
So if this continues, the opposition will be organizing as it goes. Prominent figures who join from the regime, whether political or military leaders, could play an important role if they defect.
There is the former crown prince, who could serve as a transition figure to elections. Lots of controversy over how plausible that is.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link