This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Yes, but Russia isn’t the Soviet Union. Europe’s persistent fake befuddlement over why the party of Reagan doesn’t want to support a pack of deracinated, satanist, bioleninist bureaucrats over the (nominal) defenders of autocracy, orthodoxy and nationality isn’t helping.
The other members of NATO pushed to invoke article 5, the United States rolled its eyes and agreed. Then you cucked out the second it became inconvenient and left the United States and Britain to fight alone.
Russia certainly isn't the Soviet Union, it's a weird larp of all the things you accuse Europe of there - high divorce, high crime, high immigration, 10-15% actually practicing Orthodox, high Muslim % and growing rapidly thanks to its war, massive drug abuse and HIV/AIDs, and I'm really confused why you seem to like them or find them in any way preferable to the Danes, who actually have done a lot right and are just chill friends happy to let the US take the lead mostly. 80s Reganite Christians also wouldn't presumably be into the whole weird postmodern 4Chan Pol larp thing of based and cucked and cringe that comes out nowadays and would have recognized where satan sits in the balance of Russia vs Ukraine, but that's an aside.
Anyway, you got what you want surely, the US funding to Ukraine is now tiny and the weapons/all the subsidies are paid for by the EU, isn't that directly opposite to your core point of Europe never carrying any weight? That's the key bit here right?
Who is this you in the room? I'm British, but Denmark and the rest of NATO went on all your adventures until pretty late, when the US wrapped everything up and let the sand wash back over all we did in Afghanistan (mostly the US) for better or worse (and there certainly is an argument that it was better to cut our loses). How is that anyone cucking out, other than maybe the US?
By the way, what is the attraction of using the term cucked for international diplomacy? I can never understand it myself.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link