The Wednesday Wellness threads are meant to encourage users to ask for and provide advice and motivation to improve their lives. It isn't intended as a 'containment thread' and any content which could go here could instead be posted in its own thread. You could post:
-
Requests for advice and / or encouragement. On basically any topic and for any scale of problem.
-
Updates to let us know how you are doing. This provides valuable feedback on past advice / encouragement and will hopefully make people feel a little more motivated to follow through. If you want to be reminded to post your update, see the post titled 'update reminders', below.
-
Advice. This can be in response to a request for advice or just something that you think could be generally useful for many people here.
-
Encouragement. Probably best directed at specific users, but if you feel like just encouraging people in general I don't think anyone is going to object. I don't think I really need to say this, but just to be clear; encouragement should have a generally positive tone and not shame people (if people feel that shame might be an effective tool for motivating people, please discuss this so we can form a group consensus on how to use it rather than just trying it).

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Interesting site:
https://www.philosophyexperiments.com/health/Default.aspx
It asks you 30 agree/disagree questions on a variety of "philosophical" topics, and then outputs a score calculating the inherent "tension" or cognitive dissonance in your answers.
The average score is 27% out of 100%, I score a pleasant 7%, but only because:
I'm using a common-sense or consensus definition of evil, and I don't think this is an actual contradiction. So I'm pleased to say I have zero philosophical dissonance? Who knows.
Hah, took the test. Got the same score and same tensions. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I believe you are right. A Morally consistent individual can perform evil actions. There is no contradiction.
Heck, that's the narrative crux of the Bhagvad Gita and the Mahabharata. For those unfamiliar with the canon, the climactic philosophical dialogue sees Krishna (god incarnate, head strategist and moral authority) convincing Arjuna (moral warrior) to commit acts of evil (kin-slaying) while keeping his morality intact. To drive the distinction further, Krishna later convinces Arjuna to perform an act that is both amoral and evil. (killing a nigh-invulnerable soldier while he is disarmed his back is turned). This time, the book forces you to feel collective disgust at this action.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link