This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Please, the blues have zero appetite for civil war. They want to cosplay as revolutionaries but won't ever pull the icky trigger themselves. By observed action the blues want to lawfare and shame the wielders of force, especially the Minnesota National Guard, to be the embodiment of Tim Walz Good Guy With Gun that will stand against masked fascist. Trump gives the blues animating purpose in finally fighting the saturday morning evil white man villain cartoon of the 2010s, a categorical evil with his army of jackbooted thugs all with ontologically evil motivations. Its the moral high of getting upvotes on instagram for #Resistance, and they feel especially virtuous because this time they put on boots to go outside. WOW SUCH SACRIFICE.
The absolute zero attention blues paid to Iranian protests and in fact continued support for Hamas just shows what the priority is: cosplaying Good Guy against the evil empire. Europeans screamed that fully legal deportation flights of convicted rapists were already illegal, so what difference does it make to forego restraint.
That's because Team Blue perceives American society as an extension of a high school classroom, where tattling to a teacher and expecting them to solve things for you is just the way the world works. The thought process is step 1: riot, step 2: ???, step 3: good things somehow. Resisting and being seen resisting is the point, not effective resistance; deontologists, not consequentialists. Good people protested a thing that was bad, therefore bad thing go away because we are good.
They might actually be directionally correct on much of this as it's likely an evolutionarily-selected tactic for modern-day terminally-online America, which is why they freak out when the teacher/moderator isn't on their side.
More options
Context Copy link
They know there's no risk, because they can escalate arbitrarily and the reds will give up -- the courts, even red ones, won't support their actions and the bureaucracy and military won't act. At which point the blues have demonstrated that they run the country regardless of what the outcome of elections is; they win without the war.
Agreed. The blues do maintain narrative and legal escalation dominance and population level coordination, while kinetic red advantages are restricted by appetite for really going full ayatollah.
You know what reds CAN do? Abbott 2.0.
The blues communicate their love for their precious migrants so much, just keep bussing them over. Unlimited bus tickets to the lands of milk and honey and love that the blues specifically say they want to encourage. If the migrants are such a massive economic advantage shouldnt the blues be racing to get every single body coming over. The reds can totally just bus them over!
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link