This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Whatever distinction you're drawing isn't supported by any of your examples.
Yeah, that's what it means to be a servant. Your lord is greater by you, what you have to offer is your loyalty and faith. That's literally how that works. This isn't unique to Trump -- the Clintons demanded loyalty, the Bushes demanded loyalty, the Bidens demanded loyalty, Truman demanded loyalty. How else is it supposed to work? The world runs on mob logic.
No one "permits" the right to believe anything. This is a political coalition, made up of adults, adults have separate bodies and separate wills. This is a silly framing.
This sounds nice if you never listen to any of Trump's speeches where he propounds the same ideas now he was propounding thirty years ago, as if Trump is just this kind of cipher where we never know what he's thinking. Huh?
Voters and random protesters are not Democrats' servants. Bernie Sanders absolutely has loyal servants, he's been in politics for fifty years, he has staffers and allies. You are not keeping a job working for Bernie Sanders on the Hill if you are demonstrably disloyal.
I know right-wingers who call Trump a race-traitor and cuck for the same.
Is your argument that this never happened to Trump? That the red team apparatus has never flagellated Trump?
People on the right can believe anything and still be accepted in the coalition. People on the left must toe the line on all aspects of enemy ideology or they will be ejected, is what the post means. "permits" as in can do it without facing consequences.
More options
Context Copy link
I think the original description of the problem failed because I agree that it's a good and normal thing for Trump to demand loyalty from his subordinates. The thing I find unseemly about the cult of personality around Trump is that it seems to demand loyalty from many who are not supposed to be servants of the President. "My President right or wrong" is no approach to being part of an electorate, even if he is on the right partisan side.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link