This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is the truest blackpill IMO: collective agency has been eradicated from Westerners, and it will take at least a century to rebuild the necessary infrastructure to produce it again. A shared sense of tribal origin and identity, shared heroes, shared ritual celebrations, shared sacred affinities, shared (invented) memories, allegiance to a promised land, a shared enemy, and shared tragedies are the evolved ways to collaborate as humans. Even more important is the sense of catastrophic danger to the tribe which activates threat detection. While the Westerner has all of these instincts manually turned off through years of cultural conditioning, the religiously and/or nationalistically Jewish collective does the opposite, and tries their hardest to place every member through a rigorous process of in-group allegiance to enable collective collaboration. It is a kind of asymmetrical cultural strategy and it will win every single time, because the conditioned member of the group will choose what’s best for the group for free, and more robustly.
This plays out practically as follows: the President has not been conditioned to hyper-value his own tribe, but Kushner has, so Kushner persuades Trump toward a certain path which benefits the tribe. Trump’s cabinet make-up was significantly informed by people from the tribe, and they got rid of Gaetz through what looked like a kompromat op. Trump’s favorite news guy, Mark Levin, has allegiance to the tribe, and caters his message to persuade Trump. There’s a cadre of lobbyists who will all work passionately to benefit the tribe and they are motivated by deep biological triggers and not just money, and they can wield an enormous amount of influence as we saw with Les Wexner. In fact, while the Wexner Foundation would host talks about the dangers of White nationalism, they developed a meticulous decades-long strategy to increase loyalty to Israel among American Jews and decrease the intermarriage rate (which they catastrophized as a second holocaust), employing billions of dollars toward this aim. Why would Rubio or Hegseth risk their careers and livelihood to stand up against Trump when they have no deep reflexive in-group favor? And then you have billionaires like Miriam Adelson who don’t waste their money on a random African charity but have been trained to employ it toward Israel, and she admits to this. What we see are only the branched-off actions (Miriam has a lot of money) and not the root (Miriam was conditioned at a young age, her husband was given a job by a tribe member, tribe members sought to influence her support by activating her biological instincts).
In politics, “agency” isn’t an individual thing, but a product of social network and reflexive habits and values. If a tribe member wanted to “do something positive” for his group, he can call hundreds of organizations which will paternalistically guide him and even train him toward the most effective path to benefit the group using decades of experience (“volunteer here…” “join this…” “I know a guy in this industry…”). There is no organization which does this for Westerners. You can’t just cold email someone who will hype up your feelings of collective pride, remind you of your ancestral enemy Amalek, and then tell you to do x and y and then work in z because “it’s good for the Jewish people”. Westerners are woefully behind the winning strategy of power as it is actually acquired according to EvPsych.
The blackpills don't end there! Demographics is destiny, and the West does no longer have "at least a century" to rebuild anything. A century from now, Westerners will no longer be in charge of what is currently thought of as the West. The world may at that point be African, or Muslim, or Chinese, or some new atomized globalized urbanized uniform brand of cultureless human mass, but it won't be recognizably Western.
More options
Context Copy link
Overly pessimistic, I hope. I think it could/would be rebuild much quicker through a collective crisis. I'm watching China with a lot of interest partly because of that. I think a descend into a Cold War era international order, followed by a defeat of the West at the hands of China - could be a relative minor thing like Sputnik - would jump start the entire thing right quick. Probably requires media alignment and effective political leadership, but I assume that would emerge more or less naturally.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link