This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Ok, so here's the question. It was reported that Saudia Arabia's senior royalty repeatedly lobbied Donald Trump to attack Iran. How many posts have you made complaining about this?
So I take you object to Jewish Americans and Christian Zionists lobbying the US government to take pro-Israel action?
Perhaps not, but the accusation on the table was that Israel engaged in lobbying which was either secret or illegal. It seems that accusation was false.
Please show me where I stated or implied that if it's not illegal, then it's okay. Please QUOTE me.
TIA.
One now! I dislike this. Fuck off, do your own dirty work if you want it done.
Yes. Do your own dirty work if you want it done. As they used to say on 4chan, "not your personal army".
I am also opposed to a hypothetical extremely powerful and influential Thai-americans lobbying America to get involved in their border disputes with Cambodia. The American military isn't a tool for various other governments to settle scores, it's to keep the American people safe. My safety has not been improved here.
That wasn't me so take it up with him. I think my views are quite internally consistent.
I wasn't claiming any laws were broken, so take it up with the other guy. I was just responding to your question.
You ended your comment I originally responded to with " I strongly suspect that you don't actually have a principled objection to Israel's conduct."
I have now demonstrated my principled objection to Israeli conduct.
Not really -- you did not object at all to similar Saudi conduct until it was brought to your attention and you were specifically asked about it.
So I take it that you object to US membership in NATO as well? Also, how many posts have you made referring to [[Cuban-Americans]] in an ominous way?
It was you who decided to inject yourself into our exchange and pretend I took I position which I never took.
No, here's what you said in response to me:
You pretended that I took the position that "no laws broken" = "ok"
Thus, I am politely requesting that you either (1) show me where I took such a position by QUOTING me; or (2) admit that I took no such position and apologize.
Last time I will ask.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link