site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 9, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I must have confused the details of a conversation re: Ireland.

Jew-hatred

This is an ad hominem attack, and a confused one. It’s not clear what you intend by Jewish. Are you counting Neturei Karta? The Samaritans and Karaites? Ezra Koenig? Glenn Greenwald and Max Blumenthal? If you mean “a system of beliefs and behavioral demands”, then there is nothing wrong with liking or disliking it based on its merits. I imagine you strongly dislike Salafism and Khameneism, or there is some ideology which you hate out of an impartial consideration. Do you mean the system of codified rulings considered normative among Rabbinical Judaism as practiced today? I think you got upset when I made a post a while back which specifically analyzed the moral code as taught among Orthodox Judaism.

even under what passes for "international law," that land basically belongs to whoever can hold it

This is not how the international community has ruled when they have come together at the UN. It seems you’re suggesting that international law is illegitimate. That’s unfortunate. Do you believe moral law is illegitimate? Why shouldn’t the international community come together to enjoin a minimum of rights and obligations?

it's not directly analogous to England and Ireland

How so?

Palestinians have always had a national identity (they have not)

When you’re living around everyone with a similar identity, there is no reason to distinguish (say) “Palestinian” from those living in the border regions of Lebanon. The Irish did not have a national identity until the 1800s.

Jews […] there for centuries

Yes, the Sephardic Jews lived peacefully in Palestine for a long time. They were 2.5% of Palestine in 1800! Surely this doesn’t mean they deserve to inherit the whole thing though, right?

There's nothing confusing about it. Unlike you, I am not confused about your past statements. You attack Jews regularly. You have made it very clear that you do not like Jews. You do not like the Jewish religion and you do not like the Jewish people. You criticize Israel in an unprincipled manner, by which I mean you criticize Israel in a way that only applies to Israel (unlike leftist critics who criticize Israel because they have a general oppressed/oppressor model, or sometimes a general antipathy for all things Western, with which they associate Israel), because it is by proxy attacking Jews. I'm not going to pretend we're talking about the finer points of rabbinical Judaism or Samaritans or Karaites. Nor am I "upset" about this, any more than I was "upset" about your specious analysis of Orthodox Judaism.

I am calling it out, however, because it's annoying. (I suppose in that sense, "annoyed" is kind of like being "upset"). I am not going to argue about the history because as much as I find the history of the region quite interesting and endlessly convoluted (having read a number of books by Israeli histories, of both the Zionist and New Historian school, by Palestinian historians, largely of the Edward Said school, and by Western historians both from a pro- and anti-Israel perspective), I know when I engage with you, I am not engaging with someone interested in history, in justice, or in discerning truth and nuance, I'm engaging with someone whose core motivation is animus towards Jews, and thus everything you write on the subject is an argument-as-soldier. I can't change your mind, and you're allowed to hate Jews. But I'm not indulging the pretense that this is a discussion about international law or concern for Palestinians.

“You are hateful and motivated by hate” is the same old anti-Western argument that has been weaponized against Americans for 60 years now. It’s a stale, tired, and debunked anti-Christian canard. It’s been used by Marxists, Soviets, the racially-aggrieved, you name it. In recent years it has been rehashed by the pro-Israel mouthpieces who whisper in Trump’s ear. It is a laser-guided munition aimed directly at the Western Christian soul and its beautiful guilt-prone culture. And we are over it. No one buys it anymore. The guilt-tripwire has been illuminated and darkness will not overpower the Light.

As there is evidently nothing useful I can say to someone insistent on reading everything through the lens of pure hatred, I will only point you to the words of someone more Jewish than you, who has more experience in Israel. Feel free to call him an antisemite. This is from Moshe Ya'alon, the Minister of Defense in the 33rd and 34th Governments of Israel, the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Strategic Affairs in the 32nd Government, and the 17th Chief of the General Staff of the IDF:

On the last Tuesday evening, I participated in an event marking International Holocaust Remembrance Day. When I got home, I received a message about Jewish pogromists attacking Palestinians in southern Mount Hebron, stealing their sheep and burning their property. "You can't compare!"…

After ambulances, which tried to reach the scene, were delayed by the Jewish terrorists, three Palestinians were evacuated to the hospital, one of them suffering from skull fractures. "No event can compare to the Holocaust that happened to us!"…

I immediately turned, of course, to those responsible for security in the area, and I was promised that the incident was being handled by the IDF. Until now, no Jewish terrorist has been arrested (as in many other cases), because… Israel Police is controlled by a convicted criminal, a racist and fascist Kahanist, the Shin Bet is controlled by a representative of "Jewish Supremacy" from the study halls of Rabbis Tau, Lior, Ginzburg, and Zini (his uncle), the Defense Minister prevents administrative detentions of Jewish terrorists, and the additional minister in the Defense Ministry encourages illegal outposts and equips them with off-road vehicles, in order to embitter the lives of Palestinians to the point of dispossessing them of their land, and settling the area with Jews (again, you'll ask why I accused the government of "ethnic cleansing"!?).

The ideology of "Jewish Supremacy," which has become dominant in the Israeli government, reminds one of the Nazi racial theory, "but it's forbidden to compare!"…

I commanded the Judea and Samaria Division, Central Command, and the IDF; I knew the warnings of Prof. Yeshayahu Leibowitz against a process of brutalization to the point of turning us into "Judeo-Nazis" (in his words), due to our control over another people. I did my best, even as Defense Minister, "so that we may defeat terror and remain human beings."

I never deluded myself that only through concessions would we get "peace now," and I also understood the danger of "Jewish Supremacy" to our future and existence. Therefore, I advocate separation based on Yitzhak Rabin's last programmatic speech of blessed memory on October 5, 1995, and the title of my book is A Long Short Way. As of today, Prof. Yeshayahu Leibowitz was right, and I was wrong. The role of Israel's next government is to prove that Prof. Leibowitz was wrong, and if not—we will bring destruction upon our state.

The "Jewish Supremacy" government—the government of lies and betrayal—the government of messianists, draft dodgers, and the corrupt—must be replaced before the destruction.

You are hateful and motivated by hate” is the same old anti-Western argument that has been weaponized against Americans for 60 years now

There is no correlation between what I said and what you said. Nothing I said has anything to do with hatred of America, hatred of the West, or hatred of Christians.

Jewish supremacists exist and there is plenty to criticize Israel about.

Nonetheless, I repeat and assert my point: you do not care about Palestinians. You are not motivated by humanitarian concerns for Palestinians. You are not motivated by concerns that Israel's government is not as moral and democratic as it should be. You are motivated by hatred of Jews, which you express in many threads, even threads having nothing to do with Israel or Palestinians. This you have not and will not deny, you will only keep attempting to divert the issue with counter-accusations, such as trying to find some identity politic label to affix onto me that you think will be rhetorically effective. But prove me wrong and state unambiguously that you are not an anti-Semite and you do not hate Jews. I will state unambiguously that you are wrong and I do not hate America, the West, or Christians.

I have been against war in the Middle East since my youth, long before I knew that Israel played any role in it, back when most people thought it was for oil. My first political engagement was Ron Paul followed by Infowars (it was a different time). I was against it because it harms a lot of innocent people. For the same reason: I’m against the Ukraine war, I want to execute fentanyl dealers, I’m against Somali scammers, I am against mass low-wage migration, I am for tax-maxxing the wealthy into oblivion. “Does it harm innocent people and benefit the evil” — I am against it.

So you ask me how I feel about a “group” but refuse to define it. The issue I have with Israel is its oppression against innocent people, which is more egregious because they lie about it and because America supports it. If you ask me whether we should end relations with KSA for Yemen I would say yes, but this event is simply outside my political awareness, I see nothing about it anywhere and I can’t determine what’s true or false. There are separate issues I have with Jewish organizations:

  • they run the cars4kids scam which exploits compassionate Americans by stealing their cars under the pretense of charity. Up to 1 billion a year. This is evil. They are not called out by the Jewish community. Ben Shapiro shills them on his show. The Jewish community at large runs cover for it; no jew has stopped associating with the groups operating this scheme for moral reasons. They should be called out. I know people who have donated their car to them. I have, unwittingly, passed by their location on the way to a brewery. Their town is in my state, where they pop out 8 kids each using welfare schemes in addition to the charity scheme. When 70 of them got caught welfare scheming some years ago, they used their political connections to settle: all they had to do was pay back half the amount. You can watch a video about this town published two weeks ago with 8 million views because it turns out a lot of Americans hate evil.

  • they run the “fellowship of Christians and Jews” charity. This steals hundreds of millions of dollars. They exploit the compassion of Christians by manipulating their guilt-prone instincts under the guise of charity, targeting the elderly. All of the money goes to Israel. This is evil. It is abject evil. No one in the Jewish community calls it out.

  • they are engaged in the security grant program scheme. They are disproportionate recipients of hundreds of millions of dollars in these grants, and use it to build their religious centers. This was a united effort by the Jewish community, just like how they got themselves to be labeled minority business owners for loans.

  • in NYC they steal billions of dollars in public money so that their kids can be sent to religious indoctrination centers which do not teach English; they do not even learn how to spell “America”.

How should a normal, compassionate, rational person feel about the groups behind all this?