This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This one doesn't land as well as "Lemon Pound Cake" or "Will You Help Me Repair My Door." In those tracks, the nexus between police conduct during the raid and his ridicule is apparent and obvious.
Only two of five verses even reference the raid or her work as a sheriff. The rest is built entirely on her appearance and his assumptions about her sexuality. When you strip away the production and the comedic framing, the song is basically: "A female deputy was involved in raiding my house, she has a deep voice, therefore she must be secretly a man / secretly gay", then an entire track of sexual ridicule built on that premise.
The spoken deposition section actually makes it worse. You can hear Lisa Phillips describing real emotional harm, being harassed at work, being called slurs in public, having to leave shifts because of it, having to defend that she doesn't have a penis. Afroman's apology in that same section is telling: "I didn't know you was a biological lady", revealing the whole thing was rooted in assumptions about her gender and body based on her voice.
There's no allegation of actual misconduct by her specifically. The grievance is about the raid itself, and the "revenge" he chose was to target the most visibly gender-nonconforming officer on the scene.
His other tracks attempt to humorously allege actual deficiencies in police conduct. This one doesn't critique policing or say anything meaningful about the raid. It punches entirely at someone's appearance and perceived sexuality.
In other words: it's a hip-hop diss track.
Not really. Common threads across that genre is that the ridicule connects to something real. Artistic credibility, business betrayals, hypocrisy, actual conduct. The punchlines land because they're built on a foundation the audience recognizes as legitimate.
Even in a genre where personal attacks are an art form, the best diss tracks target what someone did, not just what they look like. Afroman knows how to do that, his other raid tracks prove it. He just didn't do it here.
The biggest recent beef (that reached the Super Bowl) had entirely unsubstantiated accusations of paedophilia and domestic abuse. And that was just the worst stuff
I used to watch pure battle rap (which has diverged into its own sport as opposed to a proving ground for new rappers). Yes, the most memorable and devastating moments involve something true. Especially if it's unknown.
But lying is also acceptable if it's funny and well-crafted.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link