site banner
PaperclipPerfector  16d ago (text post)   25449 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 16, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The best way to win as a black man against white cops:

Don't make it about race.

Also, being in the legal and moral right certainly helps.

This is the story of Afroman, a rapper most known for the hit single "Because I Got High". Then his house was raided by the sheriff's office of Adams County, Ohio, based off of... almost nothing, as far as I can tell.

They damaged his door, gate, and security cameras. They were looking for narcotics smuggling and kidnapping victims, but instead found a few blunts and unused pipes, and filed no charges. The repairs cost $20k, not a single cent of which was paid by the officers, who also kept $400 of his cash.

So Afroman did what anyone would do if the cops came and unjustifiably kicked down his door and paid nothing for it: He made songs making fun of the raid, complete with his own security camera footage of the cops. This led to the production of such classics like "Will You Help Me Repair My Door", "Why You Disconnecting My Video Camera", and "Lemon Pound Cake" (about the officer who was eyeing a rather delectable slice of lemon pound cake sitting on his countertop). And in a sane world, this would have been the end of it, and the raid and associated songs would have faded into obscurity.

So of course, the Adams County Sheriff's Department decided to do the dumbest thing possible: Sue Afroman.

Somehow, the case went to trial, with the deputies unironically arguing -- with a straight face -- that Afroman's videos seriously defamed their character and reputation, enough to cause $4 million in damages. This led to a hilarious examination where a female officer cries on the stand as "Licc'em Low Lisa" plays. Afroman played his defense straight, pointing out that the entire situation was caused by the cops fucking up and raiding his house for basically no reason, and that he has a First Amendment right to criticize and make fun of the police. Also, he was wearing a badass suit covered entirely in the American flag.

The jury sided with Afroman.

A couple culture war takeaways here. First, I think the biggest factor in his success was not playing the race card at all, even though he easily could have. Instead, he stood behind the freedoms that every American has, and demonstrated that this could have happened to anyone, black or white. Every American has the right to not have their privacy invaded or property damaged, and when that right is violated, they have the right to speak freely and mock those who violated their rights. The race card would have only served as a distraction at best and polarized the jury at worst.

Second, this verdict could have only happened in America, where there is a strong legal tradition of freedom of speech. If it had taken place in a European country like Germany, where calling the government "parasites" gets your house raided, he would have lost. Having a jury trial was also very important in this case, because the judge was almost blatantly biased in favor of the plaintiffs. If this case had taken place in a country like the United Kingdom, which is seriously considering scrapping most jury trials, he also would have lost. Turns out, jury trials are there to protect the people from corrupt judges.

The point is that though Americans may be stereotyped as being irrationally fearful of a tyrannical government, this fear is entirely justified, and this case is a good example of it. Or at least a good example of how small town cops abuse their power, which seems to happen an awful lot in small towns across America.

Can we cite this as an example if the Streisand Effect too?

However if this were an earlier time when false allegations of homosexuality was considered defamation per se, might 'Licc'em Low Lisa' have been defamatory?

The intersection between a fruitless and perhaps poorly considered search and alleged lesbianism and tendency towards cunnulingus is not apparent to me.

The intersection between a fruitless and perhaps poorly considered search and alleged lesbianism and tendency towards cunnulingus is not apparent to me.

Afroman is not seriously alleging that "Licc'em Low Lisa" does, in fact, licc 'em low. He is making a joke. This is the same guy who sings comedic songs about smoking weed.

This one doesn't land as well as "Lemon Pound Cake" or "Will You Help Me Repair My Door." In those tracks, the nexus between police conduct during the raid and his ridicule is apparent and obvious.

Afroman is not seriously alleging that Lisa does, in fact, licc 'em low. He's making a joke.

Only two of five verses even reference the raid or her work as a sheriff. The rest is built entirely on her appearance and his assumptions about her sexuality. When you strip away the production and the comedic framing, the song is basically: "A female deputy was involved in raiding my house, she has a deep voice, therefore she must be secretly a man / secretly gay", then an entire track of sexual ridicule built on that premise.

The spoken deposition section actually makes it worse. You can hear Lisa Phillips describing real emotional harm, being harassed at work, being called slurs in public, having to leave shifts because of it, having to defend that she doesn't have a penis. Afroman's apology in that same section is telling: "I didn't know you was a biological lady", revealing the whole thing was rooted in assumptions about her gender and body based on her voice.

There's no allegation of actual misconduct by her specifically. The grievance is about the raid itself, and the "revenge" he chose was to target the most visibly gender-nonconforming officer on the scene.

His other tracks attempt to humorously allege actual deficiencies in police conduct. This one doesn't critique policing or say anything meaningful about the raid. It punches entirely at someone's appearance and perceived sexuality.

It punches entirely at someone's appearance and perceived sexuality.

In other words: it's a hip-hop diss track.

Not really. Common threads across that genre is that the ridicule connects to something real. Artistic credibility, business betrayals, hypocrisy, actual conduct. The punchlines land because they're built on a foundation the audience recognizes as legitimate.

Even in a genre where personal attacks are an art form, the best diss tracks target what someone did, not just what they look like. Afroman knows how to do that, his other raid tracks prove it. He just didn't do it here.

Not really. Common threads across that genre is that the ridicule connects to something real

The biggest recent beef (that reached the Super Bowl) had entirely unsubstantiated accusations of paedophilia and domestic abuse. And that was just the worst stuff

I used to watch pure battle rap (which has diverged into its own sport as opposed to a proving ground for new rappers). Yes, the most memorable and devastating moments involve something true. Especially if it's unknown.

But lying is also acceptable if it's funny and well-crafted.

It's a genre I was never deep into and haven't kept abreast of but I'd expect more.

AI I think does better with the medium.

Joseph Edgar Foreman, let me tell your story right, Raymond Elementary, 1986, a little boy with spite, Not middle school like you been telling every interview since then, Elementary, Joseph — you were targeting little girls back when. Carrie and Charmaine — yeah, you went at two of them, not one, "Hairy Carrie, Harry Leg Charmaine" — ain't you a lot of fun. Called on Bloods and Crips and Cholos: "Gather round while I rap About the hair on Carrie's lips" — that's your origin, that's your map.

"Clown these bitches so bad to the point they don't even want to be here" — Your words, Joseph, not mine — that was your goal, let me be clear, Then you told a journalist decades later with a grin: "She was paralyzed" — and you were proud of what you did to them. "I'ma talk so much trash to the point just to shut me up she'll pay me cash" — That's not a punchline, that's extortion from a child harassing for the bag. You didn't write a diss track, you wrote a weapon for the playground, And forty years later, you're still swinging at the same damn ground.

"A skunk has its spray," you told them, proud of what you are, "If you mess with me I rap about your ass" — that's not a bar, That's a confession that your music's just a weapon for the weak, You don't punch up, you don't critique — you find a flaw and let it leak. Forty years from Carrie's lip to Lisa's voice, the formula's the same: Find a woman, find a feature, exaggerate it, weaponize the shame.

Nas built "Ether" brick by brick, every line a case in court, Jay-Z's credibility, his art, his business — Nas indicted every sort, That record changed the language — "ethered" means you're done, Not because he clowned Jay's hairline, but because the substance won. Cube wrote "No Vaseline" and tore apart a whole machine, Contracts, management, and money — surgical, precise, and mean, Didn't mention what Jerry Heller looked like, didn't need to go that low, The facts were devastating enough to land every single blow. Kendrick buried Drake with "Not Like Us" and let the culture speak, Built a movement out of bars so sharp they cut you for a week. That's what diss tracks are, Joseph — receipts set to a beat, Not some Juggalo-circuit act recycling jokes from the cheap seat.

"Because I Got High" — a Napster leak that Howard Stern made hot, Grammy nominee, you ain't win, and after that? That's all you got. One-hit wonder status, your own Wikipedia says it plain, Debut album was a "flop," the follow-ups all did the same. Two hundred thousand net worth after twenty-five years in the game, Gathering of the Juggalos is where they're booking you by name. Dropped out of Palmdale High, declared yourself a Christian too, Then preached a sermon on YouTube about how God will see you through — Same mouth that wrote five verses fantasizing on a woman's sex, Same hands that punched a woman in Biloxi in the neck. "Involuntary reaction" — that's what your people said, She walked up from behind you and you put her on her back instead.

"Crazy Rap" had "she whipped out a dick that was bigger than mine" — That was 2001, Joseph, and you're still on that same line, Raymond Elementary to Adams County, woman-with-a-penis bit, Lisa Phillips is just Carrie with a badge — you haven't grown from it. Same kid in the same Wranglers with the same hole in the seat, Payless Pro Wings on his feet thinking cruelty is a feat.

Now let's talk about the raid — they came for kidnapping and drugs, Found nothing but some roach clips and some fan-made pipes and mugs, Busted up your door, your gate, your cameras — twenty grand in damage done, Four hundred dollars missing from the cash when they were done. You had a real case, Joseph. Property destruction, theft, A fruitless warrant, zero charges — you had substance, you had heft. "Repair My Door" pointed at the damage — fine, a start, "Lemon Pound Cake" was a parody — cute, but not exactly art, But then you saw Lieutenant Phillips and you heard her voice pitch low, And threw away the protest angle 'cause a woman's voice was low.

Two verses out of five even mention what the sheriffs did, The rest is "eating pussy like pizza" — what are you, a kid? The intersection between a fruitless search and alleged lesbianism Is not apparent to anyone with more than a playground sense of criticism.

And now the deposition tape — you left it in the song yourself, Lisa on the stand describing what your music did to her mental health, Can't go to Walmart, can't go to work without them yelling out your hook, Had to leave her shifts in tears while your track played in every nook. Your apology's on wax: "I didn't know you was a biological lady" — That's not remorse, that's just confirming every assumption that was shady. You targeted her because she didn't look the way you think a woman should, Same thing you did to Carrie at Raymond Elementary in the neighborhood.

You want to run for president? You can't even run a verse, Can't connect your punchline to the premise — that's a gift and it's a curse, Nas would've ethered every deputy by name with their misconduct on display, Cube would've bankrupted the department and had bars left for the day, Kendrick would've made them question every badge they ever wore, You just made a woman cry and called it settling a score.

You said it best yourself — "A skunk has its spray" — Yeah, Joseph, we can smell you from a mile away. Still that same ashy kid from Raymond Elementary with the Pro Wings on, Forty years of punching down and calling it a song.

  • -12

Afroman is funny but I don't know that anyone thinks of him as a top battle rapper.

On the hip hop side it's inseparable from the song being used (which is why one of the recent Drake-Kendrick songs became vastly more popular than the rest even if it wasn't the best).

On the pure battle rap side it's just inseparable from crowd work and performance - and writing for that particular person. Since battle rappers have an incentive to spend time in the ring (unlike rappers, for whom it becomes a potential danger once they're famous enough to not have something to gain) their styles become much more distinct and you have an incentive to attack them.

This joke about an opponent's style can only land in a public performance, and only if you know your audience.

You also get points for off the cuff freestyles, which obviously don't work online.

Like any roasting session, you need to be saying it in the kid's face in front of the other students on the playground to get the full effect.

But attempting to recreate it via AI is pretty on-brand for TheMotte.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats