site banner
PaperclipPerfector  7d ago (text post)   25397 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 23, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well, bluntly, it is that I don't consider you a remotely objective assessor of any kind of evidence related to Jews or the Holocaust because you, at such tedious and repetitive length, clearly hate Jews.

And I think your continual evasion of that question - the way you duck and weave, unwilling to, even under the shield of an obviously-Nazi-inspired screen name, on an anonymous web forum, where, again, everybody already knows how you feel about Jews - is plainly bad faith. Worse, I think it is cowardly.

The Holocaust numbers are not actually important here, because you're not a disinterested observer, and they are not motivating for you. If you became convinced that the six million figure is true exactly as popularly reported, I do not think it would change your feelings on Jews one iota. It's just not the operative thing.

Thus to repeat myself:

The more important point is that those details are in themselves a red herring, because it seems to me that, as Amadan says, even though you say that the Holocaust didn't happen, your openly-stated positions on Jewish people imply that it would have been a good thing if it had.

Bit of funny lore on that front. Be me:

  • Have traditional conservative upbringing/perception of Jews
  • Watched a couple Ryan Faulk (Alternative Hypothesis) videos on HBD
  • Start getting red-pilled on HBD
  • See, for the first time ever in the wild on unrelated subreddit, some Reddit user called "TrannyPornO" who defends HBD in the discussion thread, visit his profile
  • He poasts on some subreddit called "TheMotte", how I arrived at TheMotte
  • AltHype stops posting on YouTube because of the ascension of the YouTube censorship regime
  • AltHype posts to BitChute to avoid getting his account banned
  • I go to BitChute to watch AltHype videos
  • I see Chemistry of Auschwitz in sidebar
  • lol it's Covid let's see what the Holocaust Denier Flat Earthers have to say
  • Don't understand a lot of it, am not remotely convinced, but there is one easily digestible argument, which is that all of the extant blueprints of Krema I in Auschwitz (the one shown on tour to tourists) label it as a morgue and they all through the years document a swinging door leading to the furnaces, which makes sense for a morgue but no sense for a gas chamber.
  • Hmmm I wonder what the mainstream response to this is, it sounds like a good argument but I'm sure there's a good refutation
  • Realize there is no refutation, they just engage in authoritarian tactics to absolve themselves from even feeling the need to respond to criticisms like this because those arguments are made by Holocaust Deniers - scum of the earth and not worthy of acknowledgment by our credentialed academics
  • Reminds me of my own HBD awarness arc in which the established academics just dig into their narrative and denounce valid criticisms that question prevailing dogma
  • Sufficiently gaslit into diving deep into the topic because I don't know what's true
  • MFW Revisionists are right after reviewing essentially all the arguments and counter-arguments (this part takes years honestly)

It is fair to say honestly that most Holocaust deniers, especially the Denier repoasters on Twitter, are antisemites who use Denial as a bludgeon. I think I am rare in that investigating this topic was my own red-pill on broader Jewish Question, so-to-speak, the reason I spent so much time investigating it is because I was resistant to Revisionist conclusions. And then my change in opinion on that topic also led to questioning many other institutional norms, prevailing cultural criticisms, and finding common patterns and I share my thinking here on this forum. The end, true story. My Holocaust Denial came before my (alleged) Antisemtism, I don't think there are many such cases.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats