site banner
PaperclipPerfector  2d ago (text post)   11151 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 30, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

After reading John's (clearly partially written by AI) article, and I think him/those calling the current situation "4d chess" are engaging in Vatnik-tier copium. There is so much more downside than upside here for America. His thesis that this could be used to wield leverage over allies for protection isn't wrong, but it's a really, really stupid plan.

Especially Europe but the rest of the world has depended on the US to keep global shipping open.

I really cannot understand why this is constantly pointed out like it's a bad thing. Do you really, genuinely think that the last 100 years of American geopolitical strategy in shaping the entire world order to our advantage and then growing like crazy on top of that was a mistake??!? That every member of the American government up until now was massively deluded and accidentally giving away American prosperity/resources to the rest of the world from a sense of altruism or stupidity? And then of all people, TRUMP and his gang of blatant sycophants are the only ones to notice this. Really?

On immigration it does seem like Europe is getting better.

Because oil got more expensive a month ago? This was already the trend in Europe for the last like 5 years.

That every member of the American government up until now was massively deluded and accidentally giving away American prosperity/resources to the rest of the world from a sense of altruism or stupidity? And then of all people, TRUMP and his gang of blatant sycophants are the only ones to notice this. Really?

Yes

I mean, maybe I didn’t until you write it down and I read it, but yes I believe that the entirety of the last 46 years is cruise control by dummies.

Not the last part however - more of an accidental discovery on there end that they still aren’t aware of, probably.

Take Dillards for instance.

Absolute fucking clowns over at Dillards. Two good ideas (get rid of sales, lower overhead) and all of a sudden everyone is sniffing their own farts.

Dillards is good because everyone else is really bad. Dillards is still very bad, but hey it’s not Macys … even tho Macys is a nicer place to visit and has clean carpet.

Don’t paraphrase unflatteringly.

It’s fine to ask what people are thinking; the problem comes from assuming that you already know.

Fair enough, that was too inflammatory, edited.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats