Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?
This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.
Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
You're a member of the plucky rebels that are fighting against the evil empire that believes in X, an idea you find absolutely evil and abhorrent. The Big Bad Emperor is beyond your reach right now, but you can assassinate some of his most important supporters: Alice, Bob or Carol.
Alice is probably the better person between you two. She's smart, brave, loyal. There's only one difference: she sincerely believes that X is good.
Bob probably doesn't believe that X is good. Or that X is evil. He simply believes the side to be on is the one that is winning.
Carol probably doesn't believe that X is good. If anything, she probably finds it abhorrent, just like you. However, she is still doing her job and doing it well because otherwise she will be replaced by a true believer in X.
Which one of the three henchmen is the evilest? Which one should the plucky rebels assassinate first?If the answers to these questions are different, are the plucky rebels truly fighting on the side of good?
Why does it matter who you strike first? Timeline doesn't seem like strong evidence of guilt or righteousness; the most guilty Nazis or Confederates weren't killed first.
Because you want to minimize the area under the curve of the Evil Empire's power.
But how does the morality or lack thereof of the targets influence minimizing the power of the Evil Empire? It seems like the relevant information is not provided.
Assume all three are equally important for the successful existence of the evil empire.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link