This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
No because he's in prison and was not allowed a fair trial. It's also illegal to publicize the evidence of the case, which I think is a property unique to obscene photographs cases. Doesn't that violate public trial provision of the US constitution? How can a trial be public if it is illegal to display the evidence in public or to even view the evidence in private?
While it would look more like framing if there were less images, it's still possible if someone who had access to his stuff for a couple of hours did it. But why do you trust your government so much? Isn't it weird that they call themselves Justice, extremely narcissistic to do, while slandering this man and violating almost his entire bill of rights? They violated his right to privacy by searching him, the violated his freedom of assembly by searching him as a result of going to a political rally, they violated his 8th amendment rights by demanding 70 months in lockup for having disgusting photographs, they violated his right to public trial through the nature of the law they prosecute him on and by intimidating him into pleading guilty, and they violated his 10th amendment right by prosecuting him for something that is unrelated to interstate commerce. Then they call themselves Justice? Yes, I don't trust those people, I don't care how nasty some of the people they lock up are, two wrongs does not make a right and there is something rotten going on there.
More options
Context Copy link