This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The message sent is to be kind, considerate, etc. Would you agree that there are acts which might be considered "kind" or "considerate" but would also fall into the category of "mildly demeaning," such as holding a purse?
I wouldn't thinking of holding someone's purse as a central example of being kind or considerate, no. I can't recall ever doing that for someone, or asking anyone to do it for me, the whole thing about purses is that they're portable.
I'm not sure I understand your point. You are saying that holding someone's purse for them (upon request) is not something which is "kind" or "considerate"?
It would depend on context. If another woman asked me to hold her purse because she thought she was above me, then no it would not be unkind or inconsiderate to refuse. But if there was a good reason, then yes.
Well, I don't know if you are a man or a woman. But let's suppose that you are a man; for whatever reason you are at the same event as a woman you know (but aren't close to); you are talking; and she asks you to hold her purse while she goes to the ladies' room. Do you think it would be "kind" to hold her purse for her?
That seems like the wrong way to evaluate that interaction. It would be rude of the man to refuse, but is also rude of the woman to ask. I would think a bit less of her for asking, and perhaps also less of the man for refusing if he does it in an awkward way, but positive if he does it in a funny way.
Ok, so that means "yes," right?
No.
Ok, just so we are clear, in the situation I described, if a man agrees to hold the woman's purse, it is NOT "kind" for him to do so. Right?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
There are. I'm not under the impression that there is no message at all that would teach boys that bending over backwards for everyone is not really good for them, though.
As the other poster said, I just don't recall being taught to be kind and considerate and thinking "I'm gonna fetch shit for girls". I was thinking more like, I dunno, holding the door for the person behind me.
Ok, which shows that men are sent a message which is misleading at best and false at worst.
Good for you. Certainly there are a lot of men out there who (1) internalize the message to be nice; and (2) act nice in ways which undermine their success with women.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link