This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I wonder if there's a social-bubbles/Blue-vs-Red effect - this example, because it introduces a transactional dimension to the interaction, isn't what I'd call "super-polite". There might be a social expectation that paying back the favor further down the line would be the proper thing to do, sure, but I would consider it somewhat rude to make that an explicit offer as part of the request. It implies that the person you're asking is self-interested and would only help a pal out if he's certain there's something in it for him.
In contrast I move in social circles where the expectation is that if someone (maybe not a complete stranger, but an acquaintance, friend-of-a-friend, coworker sort of person) asks you for help, provided the request isn't phrased patronizingly or clearly unreasonable in scope, it'd be kind of dickish to turn them down. Helplfulness and community spirit are important qualities to cultivate. This is why it intuitively seems to me that shooting a girl down if she asks you for help with something is a break from established social scripts, something you'd have to actively decide to do in an effort to portray yourself as an alpha male. If all else being equal "Uh, no" would be your default answer to someone asking you for help without an offered payout, then sure, saying yes if it's a hot girl would read very differently, and it might make sense to refrain from making that exception.
I don't agree, but I don't think it affects the overall point: If the woman makes a request which would seem even mildly rude or presumptuous or inappropriate were it to come from a man, the answer should be "no."
Yes; I just think that the operationalization of that depends a great deal on your threshold for what would be inappropriate from a man (and I genuinely think this might be a matter of varying norms in different milieus, rather than something with an objective right or wrong answer).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link