site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 20, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

15
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Should include his twitter post today https://twitter.com/navalny/status/1627632098608644099?s=46&t=kZtdy_V5y071LA26Wuu8Nw

Personally I’m confused how he’s tweeting and in jail. If someone understands Russian police state better I would be interested. There’s actual a meme in the sports world that we can’t judge Ovechkin or Malkin for not speaking out since their families would be at risks. But Navalny is tweeting from jail against Putin?

Galeev whose the only Russophile I follow thinks Navalny is not neoliberal and just tailors his message for western support. He thinks Navalny is bad and just the guy who wants to be the new tsar but tells the west he’s a “good” Russian reformer. Galeev says he’s just Putin.

Galeev whose the only Russophile

He is rabidly Antirussian.

Well nobody else is really debating him. And giving off other interpretations of events. As far as I know you have

  1. Galeev

  2. Meashemer who doesn’t really explain internal politics and economics as far as I know. Call this the “realist” camp

  3. Some sort of “official” narrative western media. Which I don’t pay much attention to on anything

  4. State and nationalist statements

The word "Russophile" means pro-Russian (dependent on definitions of Russia(n)). Calling Galeev a Russophile is incorrect. That is the only scope of my comment.

Should include his twitter post today https://twitter.com/navalny/status/1627632098608644099?s=46&t=kZtdy_V5y071LA26Wuu8Nw

I like everything he's saying there.

Personally I’m confused how he’s tweeting and in jail. If someone understands Russian police state better I would be interested. There’s actual a meme in the sports world that we can’t judge Ovechkin or Malkin for not speaking out since their families would be at risks. But Navalny is tweeting from jail against Putin?

He has a team of people working for him, so presumably if he's able to communicate in any way with them, he can get them material to post on his behalf.

Russia does not appear to be an effective totalitarian regime. For example, in the documentary Navalny, his assassination is thwarted when the plane he is on makes an emergency landing. If he stayed in the air until his intended destination, they say he would have died. While initially guards at the hospital attempt to keep Navalny's people away from him, he does receive treatment even if it's not optimal. Eventually, enough pressure is exerted on the hospital or Putin that Navalny is released and is allowed to leave the country for treatment by doctors who are free to treat the actual cause of illness. There is not complete control of airplane pilots or doctors to make sure that nothing goes wrong with a nasty plan. I think this rather fits with my concept of how Russia operates: Limited malevolence tempered by the natural incompetence of the corrupt bureaucracy and not every one is on the same page.

The broader question to me is their a credible threat of protesting and being against the regime in Russia. To me this is a key question on whether the Russian people support the war or are just afraid to protest.

And knowing that answer has a lot of geopolitical policy implications. Is Putin bad or are Russian people bad.

Surely even if he is just Putin it's still an improvement. I'd trade one ineffective, powerful autocrat for a less powerful one any time.

This the reasoning is he would be the same power as Putin. Well army destroyed. But he would say nice things to west and get to sell gas again and then same imperial Moscow elite backing him. Like how the neocons like Liz Cheney left the gop and became democrats. Same basic power but backer new top guy.

Russophone, surely?