This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Agreed - dumb people are dumb, and one characteristic of dumb people is an inability to accept cause and effect, that actions have consequences, to take responsibility, etc. As well as suffering from Dunning-Kruger Syndrome. (I've known a few dumb people who knew they were less than bright and more or less accepted it, but most... don't.) Obviously this is equally true of dumb white people and dumb black people.
Yeah, that is the crux of it. My argument is not that IQ tests imply unfortunate things so we should not believe them, or that we should pretend things that aren't true because it makes dumb people feel bad. My argument is a purely practical one: given that dumb people demonstrably can't accept this, then if it's true that blacks and Latinos are dumb at much higher rates, why would you think they should just "cope" and be happy? That's not a reasonable expectation of human behavior.
What is the solution? I don't know.
Some things don't need to be solved, the solution, if we must have one, is what the French did. Stop. Pointing. It. Out. Do not collect racial data. Do not write opinion pieces about racial differences. Attempt as much as possible to pretend that race is like hair color. We did this for a while and things were getting better. I believe, perhaps in futility, that we can return to that place. But can we at least acknowledge that it was a clear miss step? That the racial grievance departments have done real and incredible damage to society?
Well, I agree. I don't think we're going back to "color-blindness", though. Even if we all collectively agreed to stop collecting data and pretend we live in a colorblind meritocracy, it will be impossible not to notice persistent disparities, and the real and lasting damage has been done - a disparity is prima facie evidence of racism.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
These are two separate issues. Obviously, they should accept it because accepting reality leads to better outcomes for the entire nation – and I posit that even dumb people are able to understand patriotism; and if they aren't willing to put the nation above their race, then @Hoffmeister25's plan for separation promises higher odds of success than the status quo.
It is also generally personally adaptive. You can extract concessions via unfair complaints, but can you use them well if you don't even realize the unfairness? This doesn't seem to work for blacks. Meanwhile a low-IQ black person who acts in full knowledge of what his IQ implies will (if properly educated) abstain from hare-brained get-rich-quick schemes and crime, work honestly in sustainable ways, and not support destructive (first of all to the black community itself) movements. In short, behave like a member of a lower-IQ Asian minority such as the Hmong, who are not thriving economically, but also are not nearly as troubled as the black community – my earlier argument about self-esteem aside, and speaking only of objective outcomes like credit scores, family structure, crime&incarceration, disease; misfortunes which are, in the case of blacks, attributed by various tribes to «systemic racism», black culture, or HBD.
As for whether they would – well, obviously they haven't yet, and they never will if everybody of consequence only affirms their suspicion that whitey has tricked them and appropriated what's theirs by right.
But it is not clear to me that dumb people cannot comprehend meritocracy.
Or is there some lower bound for this idea? Everyone here seems on board with the theory that more intelligent people naturally tend to become more competent, thus contribute more and are entitled to earn more benefits. It's not because everyone here is sure of being near-maximally intelligent or feels entitled. It's because we believe merit-based economy is better than spoils system, for the whole society. I realize this would be harder to accept if most users here were dirt poor, but probably not very much harder. The principle holds.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link