site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of July 20, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Last week anime culture war news was rather unwelcome here, so it is time for another.

The topic of last week xitter storm was anime.

Is anime weird? If so, what should parents do to make sure their kids never watch anime and become normal members of the crowd?

Fitting with the crowd as end in itself was always seen as moral duty in small c conservative tradition, nothing unusual with it.

There was a boy called Eustace Clarence Scrubb, and he almost deserved it. His parents called him Eustace Clarence and masters called him Scrubb. I can't tell you how his friends spoke to him, for he had none. He didn't call his Father and Mother "Father" and "Mother", but Harold and Alberta. They were very up-to-date and advanced people. They were vegetarians, non- smokers and teetotallers and wore a special kind of underclothes. In their house there was very little furniture and very few clothes on the beds and the windows were always open.

It is clear who the bad people are and why they are bad.

Nevertheless, massive arguments for and against torn xitter asunder and joined with even bigger arguments whether normie existence in 2020's North America is really something you should strive for or whether much better, happier, nobler and more fulfilling life can be found elsewhere.

If you examine all parts of normie life, from such basics as school, regular employnment, transportation or house building and find this is worthwhile prize, and then find out that your kid is not normie, you should indeed tell them:

"For your whole life, you will live as undercover agent in enemy territory. As Otto von Stierlitz had to pass as Nazi, you must learn how to pass as normie."

(using Eastern archetype here, in Western culture heroes are men of action facing adversity directly and challenging enemy in honorable combat, not sus characters skulking in shadows)

But parents are usually extremely bad judges what is "weird" and what isn't. They remember what was normal and what wasn't in high school in early 1980's, and are unable to comprehend that times are changing. And this is the problem barely noticed, the problem that makes this whole discourse waste of time.

It’s over. C.S. Lewis has already depicted you as the wojak, and me as the Chad.

Well, C.S.Lewis can be considered one of preeminent big C Christian small c conservative voices. When CSL calls you bad guy, you need to shut up and listen if you want to consider yourself conservative in good standing.

And it was clear that Scrubb family was meant to be bad from the first page of the book, and it was clear to intended readers, people of early 1950's, why.

This world is now as nonexistent as Narnia, so fully understanding this would need some unpacking.

So why Srubbs bad? Scrubbs are unwieldy combination of all things unpopular at the time, and lots of things were unpopular.

It is not only nonconformism of Scrubb family and their standing out of the English crowd.

1/They are COMMUNISTS.

Scrubb junior "liked books if they were books of information and had pictures of grain elevators or of fat foreign children doing exercises in model schools."

What sorts of books are this? Every reader in the early 1950's would instantly imagine Soviet propaganda books depicting land of workers as paradise on earth. And communism in general and USSR in particular were not well appreciated at this time.

2/They are HEALTH NUTS, possibly NEW AGERS

They were vegetarians, non-smokers and teetotallers and wore a special kind of underclothes.

the windows were always open.

Remember, we are in 1950's when boozing was part of life and doctors on TV recommended Lucky Strikes. What the Scrubbs think, that they are better than experts? Are they unchristian followers of some oriental superstition?

3/They are penny pinching MISERS

In their house there was very little furniture and very few clothes on the beds

Remember, we are in 1950's, time of war recovery and rising prosperity all over the Western world, even in England.

People had jobs and money for the first time in decades. Buy and consume was the order of the day. If you could (and Scrubbs are depicted as respectable educated people, not utterly destitute poor) you should buy buy buy, fill your house with stuff, then throw it away to make place for more stuff.

Not going with the plan painted you as some throwback, Scrooge like 19th century miser.

4/They are NERDS

Eustace Clarence liked animals, especially beetles, if they were dead and pinned on a card.

And not the useful sort of nerds, who are building computers, rockets and H-bombs to keep the commies at bay, but losers obssessed with useless stuff like beetles. Who needs it?

(MKULTRA research looking for new drugs and hallucinogens at all possible sources, including exotic insects and spiders, in order to fight for freedom and stand up to commies, was still strictly classified at the time).

This is silly. Everyone knew perfectly well the type he was pointing at, and it still works today because they're still fairly prevalent:

  • Communists
  • People unable to take any kind of joy in life, except a grim, smug pleasure in deliberate abstention
  • Again, people for whom deliberate asceticism and a love of debating how much better it makes them is the only source of joy in life
  • Casual cruelty disguised as scientific curiosity, only able to take pleasure in life when it's dead and in a cabinet.

Re that last line, you are reading it wrong, it's not:

Eustace Clarence liked animals, especially beetles [...]

it's:

Eustace Clarence liked animals [...] if they were dead and pinned on a card.