This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The comments on Reddit are gloatingly pointing out that Pritt is neither trans or otherwise LGBT, nor a drag queen, but a father of four married to a woman, and, of course, a Republican.
What is interesting is that Pritt was initially elected as a Democrat in 2022, switched to the Republican Party in 2023, and was re-elected in 2024 as a Republican. Someone commenting on his recent arrest on Reddit described him as "the same asshole that switched parties and platforms after getting elected", apparently not realizing that, for the Democrats, this was, in retrospect, a most beneficial move.
One thing that is unclear is that he "requested that she meet him in his classroom at Oak Hill High School to engage in sexual activity at least five to ten times". People on Reddit are reading this as saying that they met up and had sex five to ten times, but it could also be interpreted as saying that he was just pushy about meeting up, but that they didn't actually meet up. Am I being autistic with this reading or what? Not that asking an eighth-grader for sex and her refusing is any better than having sex with her.
I think the roblox angle is overemphasized in this case. It seems he met the victim originally in irl and they probably incedentally used the snap and roblox because that was what the kids were already using.
But it's kind of much worse to have predators teaching in schools rather than just being on the internet.
Strictly looking at human sexual preferences, this kind of relationship isn't even that unusual except for the fact that it's probibited by society (for good reason). Under sharia law she's probably a bit old and the man too young to be getting married.
We also don't even know for sure if the suspect groomed the victim or was actually seduced by the victim. I don't have any actual numbers but I think it's not that unusual for students to make unwanted advances towards teachers. That doesn't make the perp any less of a scumbag but it kind of give a more understandable story than pedo teachers infiltrated the school to groom kids.
I half of Europe, 14 or 15 is the age of consent. In the rest it's 16. You'd think from the headline he's been grooming an 11 year old.
They did say that he told her loved her when she was in the 8th grade. Grooming from a position of power is different to approaching a more mature teen independently.
That does change things. Serves me right for not reading the article.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link