site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of August 3, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

a significant fraction of the time it's literally on the level of "Please design me a rectangle." "Ok, here's that triangle you asked for."

I will say I used free GPT for a couple of years and never got this. But also:

the free version on mobile at least doesn't ask follow-up questions

How hard is it to put “please ask any relevant follow-up questions” in your prompt? This isn’t wizardry. We were doing this is 2023. Yes, you have to put in a modicum of effort.

And if you have an ounce of curiosity in you then you should really ask it ‘what is a QR code and how does it work’ when you say you want a QR code on your flier!

But for the average person it's being sold as "you can now do all this yourself because the AI will do it all for you". Someone who says "put a QR code in this flyer" assumes that the AI is like a human being that you would ask to do this, and the human would understand what was meant. They don't know that the AI doesn't understand and that you have to be very exact in your prompt, because the sales pitch is "This is your friendly helpful assistant who is a real person too, talk to Claude or Bob or Iris or Sally the chatbot for what you want!"

Giving human names to the machine is all part of the deliberate pitch to humanise the product and sell it as "this can replace a person, now you don't need to pay an artist or a designer or a secretary to do this for you" and that's not true as of yet. Saying people are stupid for not knowing what they have not been told they need to know is dismissive and condescending.

No, I get that, I don't like the marketing campaigns. But at some point you have to pay attention to what you're doing. If you're putting up flyers with a QR code, why haven't you scanned them at least once to know they work? And if you find they don't work, and I'm guessing 'work' here means 'link to your website' then why don't you ask the AI why they're not doing that? And if you've got no idea what you want the QR code to do, why are you asking for a QR code?

Managing AI is very much like managing humans. In both cases half the job is clarifying your thinking and soliciting follow-up questions and checking you're on the same page all the time, and "Well, I know what I want," doesn't work for AI or humans.

How hard is it to put “please ask any relevant follow-up questions” in your prompt? This isn’t wizardry. We were doing this is 2023. Yes, you have to put in a modicum of effort.

I think you drastically overestimate how well the typical normie can use anything related to computers.

I despise Apple and their products, but their entire schtick (and greatest strength in the market), at least until recently, was making their products and software as idiot-proof and smooth to use as possible. They did so at the cost of gimping it for power users in many ways, but there's a lot more money to be made from normies than power users in most cases.

The various AI companies have a long, long way to go in making stuff idiot-proof for their target audience.

How hard is it to put “please ask any relevant follow-up questions” in your prompt? This isn’t wizardry. We were doing this is 2023. Yes, you have to put in a modicum of effort.

The selling point in the commercials is that you don't. You can just talk to it like a person. Most normies don't quite get that it's sort of like a brutally autistic person you can just talk to, but you have to carefully phrase everything and anticipate mistakes that would normally come up and be dealt with over an actual conversation. In actual practice, it's less effective at anticipating your needs and problems than the 16 year old girl with a tablet standing outside a Chik'Fil'A.

The marketing for these things has been terrible from the start, I agree. Solving stupid 'problems' in stupid ways, stoking needless terror and antagonism...

And so unnecessary, too. These things percolated perfectly well with no marketing budget whatsoever.

And so unnecessary, too. These things percolated perfectly well with no marketing budget whatsoever.

You'll never become a quadrillionaire who rules the world with that kind of attitude.