This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
You can say this, but then you don't get to complain if people on the other side demonstrate negative levels of compassion for, say, Charlie Kirk or that healthcare CEO either.
There's a difference between someone who's harming you by lying and cheating, and someone who's "harming" you because he follows normal norms of discourse but you think his ideas are harmful.
More options
Context Copy link
I discuss; you complain; he whines.
And I get to do what I like, especially when there's a false equivalency between Charlie Kirk and the healthcare CEO being murdered versus Arday taking the cowardly (even if strategically optimal for his allies) route in keeping himself safe after his DElies house of cards collapsed. The use of "if" as a hypothetical is also disingenuous as well, when indeed, the "other side" has already abundantly demonstrated and continues to abundantly demonstrate negative compassion for the Kirk and Thompson murders. Any negative compassion expressed toward Arday would only be a fractional return of serve at most, considering the vastly different circumstances.
It reminds me of the false equivalency between Kirk and Floyd, when the former was a straight-up murder of a law-abiding man in a gruesome manner and the latter was a career criminal unintentionally killed or dying of a drug overdose in a more mundane one. I suppose the equivalency makes more sense if we're grading blacks on a curve and/or we consider their Lives to Matter More, but ironically enough, grading blacks on a curve is what triggered the series of events that put Arday on his journey toward self-deletion.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link