This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Recently the US city of New York, decided that BLM protestors that felt victimized by the police preventing from running amok, deserve 21500 USD (28267877.5 KRW) each.
Such a payout somewhat changes the calculus of participating in protests, peaceful or otherwise. Previously by joining a protest one showed willingness to sacrifice time and risk being temporarily detained.
But now the what the Hot Coffee Incident was in common perception notable for, harm suffered being greatly outweighed by compensation, has come true. Thus making protesting a net-gain, unless one views publicly supporting BLM to be so immoral, as there existing no sum high enough for which one would do it.
In related olds, DisruptJ6 protestors, despite alleging molestation going on for a longer period of time, and interfering with bodily autonomy in much more invasive ways, have yet to be given money.
And a week after the Jan 6 defendants sent their letter, this happened: EDIT: I misread the date; this was re an earlier complaint making the same claims.
And shockingly, the Biden Justice Department found that the conditions their political opponents were being held in were perfectly fine.
... even as a long-term skeptic of journalism, I'm amazed how bad even the Associated Press is, given that this is all public info.
AFAICT, Worrell didn't have a broken wrist but a fifth metacarpal fracture according to the (iffy) doctor's notes or a "broken hand" by his lawyer's claims. Which is kinda a trivial thing, but come on. (and the bigger concern was about what this might predict for the minimally-treated cancer the same defendant was dealing with.)
More seriously, the US Marshall's inspection summary is here. It did not "found the building where 30 Jan. 6 defendants are being held to be sufficient". Indeed, the building's quality itself was very, very far from the top concerns that the Marshall's inspection brought at either the CTF (housing J6 defendants) or the CDF (which held more and more varied defendants. At the CDF: it found poor food quality and limits to food being used punitively, punitive disabling of water for entire blocks for days leading to standing sewage, injuries without corresponding medical or incident reports, and concerted effort by guards to threaten 'snitches'. The DC Deputy Mayor for Public Safety tried to maneuver this as about the CDF building's construction, but he also denied that water had been shut off for days.
This eventually lead to a (toothless) MOU.
Similarly, none of the concerns for the CTF (which housed the J6 defendants) focus on the building's quality, and instead the report just found that "The U.S. Marshal's inspection of CTF did not identify conditions that would necessitate the transfer of inmates from that facility at this time." And the judge's summary makes that distinction pretty clear:
((And that's despite the jail barring entry to the Marshalls during a later day in the inspection, wtf.))
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link