site banner
PaperclipPerfector  3d ago (text post)   2187 thread views

Friday Fun Thread for August 28, 2026

Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.

1
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I watched two Gosling movies with a "guy" in the title.

The Nice Guys is a +1 buddy movie. Not a +2, it has its downs, but it's one of the most enjoyable movies from the tens I've watched so far. And there's a personal reason for that. More than half a life ago I played a small Final Fantasy MUD. My principal character was a rambler, a gambler and a backbiter, never picking a fight with anyone stronger than him and always looking for the easy way out of every confrontation. I loved roleplaying as him. So yeah, I finally got my own "literally me" moment.

The Fall Guy is a -1 action/romcom. I don't think this genre mashup is a terrible idea per se, but this particular execution is quite meh. The romantic side is not done well. First, Emily Blunt? Really? She has the charm of an HR manager, how can she play a romantic heroine? And then her character is mad at the Gosling's character for ghosting her after he had an accident and was hospitalized with a broken spine. Well, excuse me, princess, which one of you wasn't paraplegic and could have paid a visit to the other? The only explanation is that she's borderline, since it takes her about half a day to reconcile with him. Not much of a "will she won't she" dynamic there.

The action side is held back by the meta nature of the premise. When the protagonist is a stunt man and half the movie is set on a movie set, you have to handle this kind of nesting with care. In a single-layer action movie, the protagonist can perform death-defying stunts unselfconsciously. But in a double-layer action movie, for example, he cannot jump from a roof on a movie set, with a safety harness and all that, and then do the same "in real life" and not react to the difference.

The only character that stands out is the one played by Hannah Waddingham, the producer. I've met sexless English women exactly like her in real life.

Have you watched Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, an earlier film by the director of The Nice Guys? It's essentially a prototype to the latter film, starring a pre-Iron Man Robert Downey Junior with a fantastic Val Kilmer (also Michelle Moghnahan). I liked it better, but I liked both.

Seconded, Nice Guys is pretty good but Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is one of my favourite comedies ever.

I watched Nice Guys after it was mentioned here recently in the same breath as KKBB. I can see where the comparison comes from but KKBB is much sharper and funnier. KKBB is a favourite I can happily rewatch while I can't see myself watching Nice Guys a second time.

Under The Silver Lake is another good one in a similar comedy-noir vein.

As you can probably guess from my many, many schizo posts on here, I love Under the Silver Lake. It’s one of my favorite movies.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats