This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Anthropic released a long blog post on various examples of people caught misusing their AI. A few thoughts:
One major sort of concern that people have about AI is misuse by rogue actors. It's interesting here that they managed to catch a large variety of people doing that. While we only see who they caught, and not who they didn't catch, the ability to do detection at this scale does make me wonder whether in the long run, AI will more have the effect of democratizing the ability to do harm (as I was previously leaning more towards), or whether the ability of sophisticated actors to detect and smother that will be more important.
This gives a bit more of a feel to me of what it is like to run a surveillance state. I'm sure we will have an increase in AI-powered surveillance in the future.
At the same time, surveillance was one of the categories of things that they were listing here, seeing as Anthropic is not permitted to be used for surveillance. I am curious how the ecosystem of surveillance contractors will develop.
Finding all of this was only happened because people want to use Anthropic, because their AI is capable. When there are viable alternatives who are more permissive, people engaging in prohibited activity try to shift to use those when possible, at least, in cases where they cannot do what they want with Claude. This is pertinent for discussions about open source vs. proprietary models, as well as differences in precautions between different companies.
I think this will read like an admission of guilt/wrongdoing to the US govt. Being radically honest and open doesn't read so well to politicians and decisionmakers.
I remember thinking that some of the new Kimis sounded very Claudey. Earlier Kimis sounded genuinely distinctive but then they Clauded up.
Yeah, AGI let alone ASI is gonna cut through any human organization like a knife through butter. People cannot be trusted, they are lazy and make mistakes. They plug their laptops into some agent that does god knows what (it's more convenient and we 'just trust' the machine).
Alternately maybe they're lying since Kimi is the biggest Chinese threat to Anthropic and they want to pull the eye of Sauron (Party security-state) down on them as a suppression tactic? And admitting how their models were used for all this bad stuff is a galaxy-brained ploy to get more regulation, guard the lie with a bodyguard of truth? Who can say.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link