Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 113
- 1
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Inspiring controversy on Reddit today is an extremely long-winded comic, "I Don't Like My Boyfriend". Each of its 12 panels was posted as a separate image, so here are some consolidated renditions for your convenience.
One image, millions of colors (11 MiB)
One image, 256 colors (2.3 MiB)
Text (5.8 kiB)
In this comic, a woman contemplates how she doesn't like her boyfriend (who is drawn as a short, fat Chudjak). She finds him boring and annoying. However, he is smitten with her, and she has never had any friends, let alone romantic partners, other than him. She wonders whether she is just an unlikeable person, and should be more grateful for having hooked a person with such low standards. The general opinion of commenters seems to be hatred for the woman.
This actually matches my personal experience with attempts at friendship (1 2) somewhat well! I eventually couldn't tolerate my pseudo-friends any longer and kicked them all to the curb, and the commenters seem to think that the woman depicted in the comic should do the same with her romantic partner.
Do you have any thoughts on this topic?
Ah. That's a common enough story.
General advice for the men reading: taking interest in and engaging with the interests and activities of your female partners is important. If you can't generate it organically, then you better learn to fake it.
I can hear the objection already. Faking it is dishonest, she will see through it, and being caught faking is worse than never having tried. I half agree, in the sense that "fake" is probably the wrong word. What I actually mean is something closer to "build a habit."
Look at a person who sets a weekly reminder to call his mother. I wouldn't say he loves her less than the person who simply remembers on his own. The reminder is what love looks like in a brain that is bad at remembering things. The effort is the thing being measured, and is not much worse for being intentionally generated.
I've seen this before - a lot of women will become deeply dissatisfied if you're not doing this. You can be well off, handsome, good in bed, etc etc, but they'll feel that something is missing.
The gap gets filled by small things. Remembering a birthday without being reminded. Asking how her friend's surgery went. Flowers on a Tuesday for no reason, except that she appreciates flowers. Remarking on the fact that she got a haircut. None of these is individually important, which is precisely why they work as a signal. The only reason to do something that does not matter is that you were thinking about the person it does not matter to.
I've gotten better at all of that, with time and intentional effort. I've had exes complain I sometimes appeared checked out, or that I didn't get them flowers. Once that was done and dusted, I set about improving. I'm buying a bouquet today.
That is not to say that the stereotypically male side of a relationship isn't important: being a provider, making her feel safe, taking care of things. These all matter greatly. They are necessary, but in many cases, might not be sufficient.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link