This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Okay, let's say I, an anarcho-socialist, organize some militant antifa group and breach the capitol, tactical gear and blunt weapons and chemical spray and all, during the counting and certification of the Electoral College votes to disrupt that. Is your contention that I would face significantly lesser prosecution?
What about Operation Backfire, or slapping domestic terror charges on Stop Cop City protestors? Or if those don't count, why not?
Leftist for a summer burned down parts of major American cities. One famous example was in Portland where they literally sieged a federal courthouse for days on end.
Compare that to a few hours of a protest that got a bit violent. You are out to lunch if you think the right is treated with kid gloves and the government attacks the left. It’s the exact opposite.
More options
Context Copy link
Tarrio did not breach the capitol, much less in tactical gear. The people who did were unarmed. Leftists interrupt similar events on a routine basis - it doesn't make the news because it's totally expected. They get escorted out, maybe some arrested for a few hours (just for bragging rights), and then the next group is brought in to start screaming and disrupting the proceedings.
Okay, inartfully phrased on my part, I didn't mean to imply Tarrio was there. But the seditious conspiracy charge doesn't depend on physical presence so much as on his participation in the conspiracy. The jury found that Tarrio helped create the Ministry of Self-Defense, establish its command structure, recruit participants, and coordinate the operation whose objective was to prevent the certification by force. That's why his absence from the Capitol isn't exculpatory.
And that's just not true as a categorical statement. Dominic Pezzola smashed a Capitol window with a stolen police shield and used it to gain entry. Christopher Worrell was wearing a tactical vest and carrying pepper gel. Michael Sauer was wearing a ballistic vest, Kevlar gloves and a balaclava and deployed chemical spray against police.
Okay, they shouldn't do that shit and they should be arrested if and when they try and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, or any similar government proceeding. I'm not going to defend that shit.
This is praising with faint damning.
The point is that they do, irl, in fact, get to do that. And even when they do much more extreme things like launch sniper ambushes on ICE officers, it's only the people actually present who get charged, so far as I am aware.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link