This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Agreed the worst is uppity engineers who get off on calling everything AI slop. They were the same ones who dismissed LLM agents as ever having the ability to develop software as good as them when it was new, now that the writing is on the wall they have a new way to protect their ego: call everything AI slop.
Can you rewrite your PR description? It's AI slop. Get the fuck out of here, the description is actually fine, just because you can tell it was written by an LLM doesn't make you any better of an engineer.
Haven't ever seen an AI pr description hit the points that are actually important, like what the pr is actually supposed to do.
They always just rehash the object level changes without context, which are obvious from the code anyways.
The point of the text box is to convey additional information that's not obvious from the diff.
This is just so outdated, the PR descriptions absolutely provide context and link Jira tickets. Vastly superior to previously human-written PRs. Granted that's only been true in the past say six months. But yes, believe it or not the agent that wrote the code is also at better at writing the PR description than you are.
This is why it just screams "uppity engineer" to me. Really? You're going to tell me that the LLM can't write a PR description with necessary context but you can? No. If you gave it the relevant context during planning it will be described in the PR description, and described way better than previous human-written PR descriptions.
Maybe you can make it do that but I haven't seen a single case of what you say in the wild.
Why don't you show an example if such a thing exists? I can show you dozens of examples of shit made with the latest models, let's see you show a single example of a good pr.
This is really the phenomenon I'm describing. I cannot believe there are people who believe what you just said- that using the latest models, an LLM can't create a good PR including a good PR description. You are just in denial in order to protect your ego, like before it was "LLMs will never be able to code as well as me" but now that's gone so these uppity engineers are pretending LLMs can't write PR descriptions when they absolutely can do so very well with barely any handholding.
It is not the case that LLMs are capable of writing ~99% of code but are unable to write PR descriptions of the code they wrote, it is the case that egotistical engineers still want to assert a sense of superiority by calling things "AI slop" which are actually well-written and useful and vastly superior to what they would have handwritten by hand.
Show me an example then. I'm waiting. I've seen dozens of prs from the latest claude opus and they all suck.
If AI is as good as you say it is, surely there must be one pr in an open source or source a available corporate project that demonstrates this.
This is an example of an AI-generated PR with an AI-generated PR description I would instantly recognize as LLM-generated. It's totally fine. Yes, it's obvious that it was not written by the engineer and that's honestly what sets off the uppity engineers who complain about "AI Slop" that majority of the time. They can just tell it was written by AI so they complain and nitpick.
This pr description sucks, but you're just going to say that anything I say is just complaining and nitpicking.
So it seems we're at an impasse here.
Just egotistical coping if you think this PR description sucks. Like the Reddit artists who will never admit anything made by LLM is good when they know it was made by an LLM. You know it was written by AI so you are anchored on it sucking. Thanks though for demonstrating the exact mindset I was describing in my initial post.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link