This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Nothing. I've evaluated my own goals, values, and notions of what I'd like to accomplish and realized they all came down to either direct egotistical buttressing or else buttressing for secondary layers. @SubstantialFrivolity above notes he gains satisfaction from making the world around him a tiny bit better, but that reeks of a secondary layer of buttressing, while even his talk of jobs well done sounds like he's glorifying perfectionist urges latent in certain 'engineering-minded' individuals rather than, necessarily, true results.
True results would reveal that, for instance, slop-programmers earn more not only in commercial terms but also in terms of social praise in many cases than perfectionists, so that external signals would seem to validate their proclivities to a greater degree. Many of the world's most successful people operate on a haphazard basis. The proclaimed principle of doing a job well done would seem to be entirely removed from objective measurements, and so its validity can only be attested by its own proponent, whose benefits in promoting social acclaim for urges he inherently possesses cannot escape notice.
Unflattering terms cannot be avoided because the underlying human animal is unflatteringly conceived. A species born of darwinian struggle, embedded in social structures encouraging egotistical self delusions and self-promotion of their own worth and validity, all the while chasing means to further darwinian success. The instincts for biological selflessness and charity, in comparison, are very little.
In this case, we can write off the category of "coverup for simian greed" as useless, as all categories that include everything are, and proceed to categories that are useful for more than nihilistic grandstanding.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link