site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 26, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

2
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

FPV drones are for most intents and purposes illegal to fly (you can technically do so with a spotter keeping it in line of sight, or with a hard to obtain license). However, there's no law against building one, and the FAA has not nearly enough enforcement capacity to do anything about it if you do fly it. Rigging them to drop things is legal, though actually dropping something from it isn't, but again, no enforcement capacity. The Trump administration banned many drone parts using the FCC, but this too is unlikely to actually have any effect. The limit remains getting the grenades.

FPV drones can be flown, just with in line of sight. It's pretty much just a usecase deployment bottleneck, which would already be too late for FedGov interference. You can still test and develop your FPV drone if you just stand in a field and fly it.

The Trump administration banned many drone parts using the FCC

I might be misremembering but wasn't this mostly a DJI company ban? Drone parts themselves are producible, and manufacturable/craft-able. You just can't order cheap chinese drones and deploy from those. Only American-Made(TM) domestic weapons.

the limit remains getting the grenades.

Yes agreed. I'm shocked we haven't seen a jailbroken LLM finetuned on chemistry textbooks and old anarchist-explosive making books developed for the purpose of democratizing energetic creation and particularly blasting cap development. I suppose they could exist out there but aren't being publicly advertised.

The DJI company was banned, but also all new models of non-American UAS (drone) parts. There's a lot of drone parts that American companies simply don't make, or don't make except for a few small companies who do it for the defense industry only. Transmitters and receivers, flight controllers, servos, and motors. Motors probably don't need FCC certification, servos are general-use items, but flight controllers and transmitters are pretty drone-specific.

Yes agreed. I'm shocked we haven't seen a jailbroken LLM finetuned on chemistry textbooks and old anarchist-explosive making books developed for the purpose of democratizing energetic creation and particularly blasting cap development.

The problem isn't the knowledge; you can get that anywhere. The problem is

1) Getting precursor chemicals.

and

2) Not blowing yourself up making the stuff.

Number 2 is probably the larger. Electronics is easy, chemistry (especially explosives chemistry) requires a lot of washing and temperature control (often cooling and heating at the same time, as with nitroglycerin) and very careful control of impurities (e.g. if you're making an azide propellant, it doesn't take much lead getting mixed in to end up with a primary explosive. Which might be a good thing, but only if you intend it). Anyone using AI starting from zero is either going to (most likely) produce nothing or just blow themselves up.

Once you've made the stuff, putting it into a useful form is an art of its own, but a bit less fraught.

Once you've made the stuff, putting it into a useful form is an art of its own, but a bit less fraught.

Yeah, but nitroglycerin? That stuff tends to result in an ignobel fate on a good day.