This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Oh my dear friend, you have plainly not read me sperging out about his views on the Annunciation (hint: the point of it is not the Incarnation, redemption, repairing the broken relationship between God and man or atonement for sin, the point is God is okay with abortion so go right ahead and have your abortion without guilt like the mean ol' bad right wing Christians try to make you feel!) Even the liberal Jesuit magazine had to go "Er, no" on that one 🤣
He had to clarify what he meant by "God is non-binary" (theology behind that remark is not incorrect, but it's a shit-awful way of phrasing it and Jimmy boy was clearly trying to be both one of the cool kids and get the normies all het up, but just inserted his foot in his mouth).
His church is indeed hyper liberal, the retired-but-came-back Pastorette Babs was assuring all and sundry that Jim boy was lying through his teeth about LGBT+ issues in order to get elected, but once elected would reliably go back to the right side of history (in another interview, she wasn't as sure about if Jesus ever existed, but she was sure about Jimmy boy). The main pastor of the church thinks, well, where do I even begin with the bounty of material from "referring to God with masculine language makes girls feel their brothers are more important" onwards? Jimmy boy isn't quite as to the extreme edge as his pastor, but he's done the usual "True Christianity is all about being nice" liberal crap in politics so to sum up, this Catholic isn't sold on how solidly Presbyterian this seminarian is, apart from "member of a progressive church in a liberal branch of the denomination and reliably on-board with the Democratic platform on everything".
Though fear not, he has now accepted there are two biological sexes and not six 😁
This is still just so crazy to me. Even secular historians agree that Jesus existed, it’s decisively been the (again, secular) consensus for over a century, at least. This could be sort of an edgy but intriguing thing to say in like the Vienna cafes of the early 1800s, now it’s just stupid.
The Texas senate race this year is truly the Battle of the Bad Candidates, isn’t it. I don’t envy people voting in that one, especially moderates. Curious if there’ll be an unusual rate of abstention in that particular vote.
Years back, as an interested onlooker to the Anglican Wars, I got an introduction to some of the wackier ideas of liberal Protestantism and hoo-boy. Pastorette Babs is a church leader not because she believes that god shit, but it's a useful tool for social liberalisation and the doing good stuff can be extended out to "this means pro-reproductive justice, pro-gay marriage, pro-trans rights and the sixty other liberal to progressive notions pulled out of the grab bag". She's an old lesbian so this is catnip to her - ha, take that all you dumb right-wing Christians of my youth who told me my lifestyle was sinful, I'm a lady pastor now, so how do you like that?
Jesus Mythicism is just another step on the path, after all what really matters is how we feel inside about things and building community and being Good People, and if the idea of Jesus helps you do that, then fine! Just don't force people to have to believe in this being literal, and we're all good.
Though Pastorette Babs is still not as shocking as the former Primate of The Episcopalian Church, the very smart and educated* (she has a science qualification as an oceanographer!) Katharine Jefferts Schori, who managed to preach a sermon where the encounter of St. Paul with the possessed slave girl is the excuse for scolding Paul for being jealous of other people having spiritual gifts, so that is why he exorcised her. Yes, being possessed by a demon and your owners using that to make money off you as a fortune teller is a beautiful gift of God, and if Paul had only been able to recognise how special and wonderful this was, then he would have been able to learn. About slave owners and demonic possession. Being good things.
"Maybe there was no actual Jesus guy" is just a commonplace of liberal theology after that.
*There was a wonderful interview with the NYT shortly after her election as Primate where she was asked about the Episcopalian numbers sinking like a stone, and she came back with "well, we're educated so we tend not to have lots of kids, unlike the Catholics and Mormons". Managing to insult two different denominations in one go, that takes talent! 🤣
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link