site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 2, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why couldn't God save his followers in Lisbon from getting obliterated by an earthquake on All Saint's Day, 1755? They lit their candles, gathered in churches. The earthquake knocked them down and the resulting firestorm, earthquake and tsunami razed the city.

What kind of omnipotent, all-loving God treats his followers this way?

Wrong question, wrong approach to the problem of evil. What happens over here is finite, what happens in the afterlife is infinite. If anything the question should be why doesn't God save all his followers like he did with the ones in Lisbon in 1755? Why does He grace only a few infants with death before they get the chance to sin? But the real question is another: can an infinite punishment for a finite crime really be called good?

Once we take that seriously though, shouldn't an urgent cause be raising child mortality? Gotta get those kids dying of diseases before they can sin, pump out more kids too, be just so reckless as to not be actually murdering them... But Jesus also went around curing the sick. So what's going on here? Is children dying good or bad?

Real Christians naturally wouldn't fall into this kind of gotcha. The values and outcomes are mostly fine but they rest on a weak foundation. There are arguments assembled like epicycles to prevent and evade these kinds of inconsistencies including the general-purpose 'you can't understand God's plan, just trust that he knows what he's doing and has your best interests at heart'. Whereas if we abandon the all-loving omnipotent everything falls into place smoothly. Children dying is bad in an uncomplicated way. They're lost forever. Sometimes natural disasters wreck you in an impersonal, mechanical world. They need to be worked around via warning and sturdy buildings. If you pass the test (however wildly difficult and unfair it may be), you live. If you fail, you get wrecked and die.

C.S. Lewis, former atheist, explored that in The Last Battle. It wasn’t the creatures and talking beasts who had sinned greatly who went to the left, into Aslan’s shadow.

Each man, dwarf, centaur, talking dog, and other diverse being met Aslan at the door of the afterlife. Those who felt joy on seeing Him in His full glory walked inside gladly. Those who saw the loving God of their universe and rejected Him with disgust walked away from Him into the darkness.

Even the dwarves ended up in Heaven who’d shot the Narnian cavalry and sneered at the idea of Him due to propoganda. Aslan was invisible to their self-delusion.

It’s a fantastic exploration of the idea of eternal damnation, and worth bringing into the conversation.

Claiming that Lewis was a "former atheist" is an exaggeration. He still heavily believed in the spiritual and supernatural, and his atheism was based on hating God for the bad parts of his life, not on the kind of intellectual atheism that matters here.

It also seems a little harsh to send someone to eternal torment because he says "I can't tell the difference between you and someone psychically meddling with my head".

That sounds swedemborgian to me. He went further and said that hell basically wouldn't suck that bad from the perspective of the souls that chose it, I don't know what Lewis imagined. But I don't think it's the canonical view, that you get a final saving throw after death.

Does it work for you? Imagine the worst person ever, kills and rapes his whole life away, but after death he sees god, says "yep, I guess I was wrong" and just like that he gets the same reward as the most pious of humans. My position has been for a long time that the problem of evil is mostly psychological.

just like that he gets the same reward as the most pious of humans

Jesus went out of his way to tell us a parable about exactly this.