This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
What in the world do you mean by this? Military disability by definition only goes to those who were in the military, and who have documented injuries/disabilities related to that service. Where do you imagine fraud comes in to it?
Maybe I am online too much but most people who follow the data collection on military disability pay realize it’s a lot of healthy people getting disability who spent a couple years in the military. To begin to educate you on the issue look at Graham Platner who ran for Senate and runs a farm while getting a 100% military disability rating.
https://www.pressherald.com/2026/05/11/how-can-graham-platner-run-for-senate-with-a-100-va-disability-rating/
If you are serious curious spend a half hour with Google and AI to see why policy wonks consider military disability as semi-legal fraud now.
I'm neither 'curious' nor need to 'begin to educate' myself, I'm in the military and know many people on VA disability. A friend of mine had to fight for years to get 100% disability, he hasn't been able to work since he got out. Another one got blown up and it affects his ability to think - is that fraudulent because it's mental health?
If you want to argue that military servicemembers don't deserve disability payments, or that they should be less, or that standards for medical evidence are too low, then make that case. But calling it 'fraud', even '90% fraud', is simply offensive.
So if someone doesn’t have an actual injury that prevents them from working but gets disability that’s not fraud?
I 100% agree there are real cases of military disability but that in no way contradicts my point that many cases of military disability appear to be essentially fraud.
We currently have 1.85 million Americans with 100% disability rankings in 2026. In 2015 we had 493k veterans with 100% disability ratings. The US withdrew from Iraq in 2011. Afghanistan we only had like max 20k troops since 2014. So where did 1.3 million fully disabled veterans come from? These are massive numbers. Since 9/11 we have 2.7 million Americans who have deployed.
So yes a 50% rate of “fully” disabled is insane. And most people in the military do not serve in combat roles.
Just because a group has a “sympathetic core” does not mean that there aren’t a huge amount of people adjacent to the core abusing the system.
And yes if you are fully capable of running a Senate Campaign then you are not 100% disabled so we even have very high profile cases of obvious fraud.
My 90% fraud might be too high. The 2014 disability numbers are likely mostly true cases.
Not sure where your numbers come from, but the data I found has less than 30% of disabled veterans at 100% disability. Additionally, many of them are older veterans whose percentage rose after a second or third claim.
You may be misunderstanding what 100% disability means. The answer to your question is yes. From benefits.com:
For instance, you can have one big injury like an amputation, or multiple smaller ones that add up according to the VA's formula, or you can have a specific set of injuries that you have documented prevent you from, say, holding a particular job (which could be otherwise minor things like insomnia). All of these require pretty extensive medical documentation, and then it is the job of the VA to make those determinations.
'Fraud' implies that the person getting the benefit has lied to get something they don't deserve, but that is simply not the case here. The input to the system is medical documentation of conditions. It seems to me that you are objecting not because you think 90% of veterans are forging a bevy of false doctor's notes, but rather because you think that specific conditions don't deserve to get as much disability pay as they do. This is not a question of fraud, it's a question of policy.
I'm curious, is your thinking on this down-stream from the Platner controversy? I saw a tweet on one thread claiming the same '90% of VA Disability claims are fraud' - maybe that's where you set your baseline.
“ 'Fraud' implies that the person getting the benefit has lied to get something they don't deserve, but that is simply not the case here.”
I would be shocked if we’ve even had 1.35 million actual combat personal since Vietnam.
I find your view abhorrent disgusting and I would strip you of citizenship if I could.
And I won’t just call this fraud. It’s also fraud when 13% of Americans are on food stamps and my local convenience store pays $20 an hour. 13% of Americans do not lack the ability to feed themselves.
My mom cared for my uncle who was basically in bed for 2 decades from Vietnam. That’s a disability. It’s entirely disgusting that people are abusing the programs that were meant for him.
So yes go get a fucking job and get off welfare.
Words have meanings. You can't get mad because your made up redefinition is called out.
K thanks for the conversation. Glad you got to explain your totally reasonable position.
I’m assuming you are American. It’s not some made up definition. It’s what Anglos mean by fraud. Using Anglo definition in an Anglo country is fine. So Yes it is in fact fraud.
Bullshit. Give me ANY evidence. And to be clear, "I say so" isn't evidence.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link