This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
If I'm scouting a CEO, I probably want him to have a mistress. Lacking a mistress probably indicates a lack of ambition, or a skill issue, both of which are fatal in a leader. Like one of the old school scouts in Moneyball moving a guy down a draft board because of a fat girlfriend, but I think the analytics back me up on this.
If you look at the performance of tech stocks after major infidelity events, Gates gets got and MSFT goes up, Bezos gets buffaloed into ending his marriage by an all-time gold-digger and AMZN goes up, Musk's companies continue to roll despite whatever it is he's doing with his complete lack of moral fiber.
If you score American presidents by mistresses, infidelity is highly correlated with quality. The loyal presidents (Dubya, Obama, Ford) were mostly flops, the lotharios (Eisenhower, Roosevelt, Kennedy, Clinton) were much more effective. Presidents are a good proxy because if they did, we pretty much know about it. Similar results obtain for English kings, and biblical kings for that matter.
So it's not that it doesn't impact everything he does, it's that it's probably a positive indicator.
And hell, spy stuff aside, she's a perfectly appropriate gf for Jensen. She's age appropriate, she's intelligent, they have a lot in common. They look good together. She's not a floozy or a room temperature iq tramp. For one of the most powerful men in the world, a billionaire with the power to make or break countries and companies, this is a very reasonable degree of infidelity! He's worth $90bn and he has a peer girlfriend that he takes out for nice dinners. That's way above average degrees of monogamy from such a man, and even then it apparently took the full power of the CCP to get it done.
Wow this is crazy. Huh I hadn't actually thought of it like that. I suppose that makes sense yeah. I don't love it but I can't argue with the logic heh.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link