Hey there! For complicated reasons, some of which I will explain later, I'm in the middle of dong a pretty gigantic revamp to the Motte codebase. Right now, this means "fix a bunch of small bugs". Later, other things will be happening.
The immediate goal of this is not to massively transform the site or do a Digg v4/New Reddit thing. Frankly, if the site remained exactly the same (but with fewer bugs) I would be happy.
The long-term goal isn't going to be quite that static, though. The long-term goal is to set things up to allow more subcommunities, similar to how subreddits work. This will be a larger set of changes. These changes will not obsolete The Motte itself; I am absolutely aiming for a site that can comfortably keep holding The Motte. I've talked about this before if you want to go read about it - this is still the same plan, for what it's worth, it's just now being (slowly) executed.
I will be posting more, and asking questions about next steps, when actual site behavioral changes are in the queue. This just isn't that! This is infrastructure work.
tl;dr: The site backend may be a little wonky for a bit, sorry about that, please report any bugs.
(and mods, feel free to unsticky this in a few days if I forget)

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'd stop posting if that happened. Or at least post much less frequently, as I do in Data Secrets Lox.
I wonder if there's some sort of hybrid system that would keep the dopamine hack while avoiding the way upvotes tend to negatively impact discourse. Like maybe upvotes and downvotes are private and only visible to the OP. Or users get a monthly allotment of private "awards" they can send to people with particularly good comments.
I want to be able to encourage engaging effortposts and thougtful replies to my own comments, but also don't love the way upvotes encourage us (me fully included) to play the popularity game.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link