site banner
ZorbaTHut  4d ago (text post)   2424 thread views

Site Backend Changes

Hey there! For complicated reasons, some of which I will explain later, I'm in the middle of dong a pretty gigantic revamp to the Motte codebase. Right now, this means "fix a bunch of small bugs". Later, other things will be happening.

The immediate goal of this is not to massively transform the site or do a Digg v4/New Reddit thing. Frankly, if the site remained exactly the same (but with fewer bugs) I would be happy.

The long-term goal isn't going to be quite that static, though. The long-term goal is to set things up to allow more subcommunities, similar to how subreddits work. This will be a larger set of changes. These changes will not obsolete The Motte itself; I am absolutely aiming for a site that can comfortably keep holding The Motte. I've talked about this before if you want to go read about it - this is still the same plan, for what it's worth, it's just now being (slowly) executed.

I will be posting more, and asking questions about next steps, when actual site behavioral changes are in the queue. This just isn't that! This is infrastructure work.

 

tl;dr: The site backend may be a little wonky for a bit, sorry about that, please report any bugs.

(and mods, feel free to unsticky this in a few days if I forget)

27
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I upvote this post.

Joke aside, I'd add another vote for removing the votes entirely. The information they provide is too vague. I get that some people feel they need the votes to actually motivate themselves to post at all, but IMO engagement, i.e. follow-up discussion, is the metric one should pay attention to, not zero-effort clicks.

Maybe my 4chan biases are showing here.

It happens not infrequently that I appreciate a comment but have nothing else to add (e.g., ToaKraka’s legal posts). In those cases, the upvote button is rather handy.

It's a shame that "I agree with this." posts are frowned upon.

I agree with this. Mods plz no ban.

I have similar 4chan biases, votes are Reddit-brained retardation that encourages saying what you think people want to hear so you can feel warm fuzzies from all the updoots.

Mind you 4chan's design kind of encourages posting the most heinously retarded engagementbait you can come up with, so it's not ideal either.

Mind you 4chan's design kind of encourages posting the most heinously retarded engagementbait you can come up with, so it's not ideal either.

Suited to its purpose. That’s alignment done properly.

I upvote this post

Don’t you dare. A true agreement would downvote this post in solidarity.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats